etheen — etiket CAS 74-85-1

etheen

0,99 €

Etylen, CAS 74-85-1

🔒 Demomodus — dit artikel is niet te koop.

Legale stof. dhscientific.com is een demonstratie van het MOL-GOD-platform — wij verkopen niets en er worden geen bestellingen verwerkt. Verboden stoffen worden hier automatisch geblokkeerd op basis van de regelgevingscanon (vergelijk bijv. heptachloor).

Controle van uw VIB — gratis → · Contact

MolGod_SDSCARD_1
REACH 2020/878
v2 · 21.07.2026
Category:
🧬 3D-molecuulvisualisator
Molecuul laden...
3D-model Ethylene, CAS 74-85-1, molecuulformule C2H4, molaire massa 28.05 g/mol
Chemisch overzicht: EthyleneMolGod_OVERVIEW_1
MolecuulformuleC2H4
Molecuulmassa28.05 g/mol
Smeltpunt-169.11 °C
Kookpunt-103.72 °C
LogP (lipofiliteit)1.2
IUPAC-naamethene
SMILESC=C
InChIKeyVGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Synoniemen: ETHYLENE · Ethene · Acetene · Elayl · Olefiant gas

Gegevensbronnen: PubChem (NLM/NIH)
Laatst bijgewerkt: 2026-11-10

📊 Fysisch-chemische eigenschappen

Snel overzicht

Formule: C2H4
MW: 28.05 g/mol
CAS: 74-85-1
Uiterlijk: Colorless gas
Geur: Sweet
Geur: Sweet

Gedetailleerde eigenschappen

Eigenschap Waarde Eenheid Condities Bron
Smeltpunt (mp) -169.11 °C (-272.4 °F) 1 atm
Kookpunt (bp) -103.72 °C (-154.7 °F) 1 atm
Vlampunt -100.00 °C (-148 °F) closed cup
Wateroplosbaarheid 0.131 g/L 25 °C (77 °F)
🔬 Geavanceerde eigenschappen

Chemische identificatoren

SMILES: C=C

Gegevensbronnen: PubChem, NIST Chemistry WebBook, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (103rd ed.)

Laatst bijgewerkt: 2026-07-11

Regelgevingsstatus van de stof
Deze stof is onderworpen aan reglementaire vereisten: beheer van gevaarlijke afvalstoffen (BDO-register). Details in de sectie "Regelgevingsstatus (REACH/ECHA/CLP)" en op de SDS. Regelgevingsinformatie — beperkt de aankoop in deze winkel niet.
🧮 StoichiometrierekenmachineMolGod_STOICH_1
🔍 Externe identificatorenMolGod_EXTID_1
12 van 16 ID-systemen75%
DatabaseIdentificatorActies
CAS Registry Number74-85-1Openen →
PubChem CID6325Openen →
InChIKeyVGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-NOpenen →
InChIInChI=1S/C2H4/c1-2/h1-2H2
SMILESC=C
EC Number200-815-3Openen →
KEGG CompoundC06547Openen →
HMDBHMDB0029594Openen →
ChemSpider6085Openen →
MeSH UID (NLM)C036216Openen →
UNII (FDA)91GW059KN7Openen →
WikiData QIDQ151313Openen →

Bronnen: PubChem (NIH), Wikidata SPARQL, KEGG, ChEMBL (EBI), CompTox CTX (EPA).

📡 Spectroscopie — CAS 74-85-1MolGod_SPECHUB_MAIN
📊 Spectra (NMR, IR, MS, UV-Vis) (1)

Beschikbare spectrumtypen: IR

IR-spectrum (KBr, 4000-400 cm⁻¹)

446 datapunten · Bron: NIST WebBook · NIST ↗ · 📥 JCAMP-DX
📋 Piektoewijzingstabel (peak assignment)
Type Positie Intensiteit Toewijzing
IR 454.01 1 —
IR 461.51 1 —
IR 469.02 1 —
IR 476.53 1 —
IR 484.04 1 —
IR 491.55 1.1 —
IR 499.06 1.1 —
IR 506.57 1.1 —
IR 514.08 1.1 —
IR 521.59 1.1 —
IR 529.1 1.1 —
IR 536.61 1.1 —
IR 544.12 1 —
IR 551.63 1 —
IR 559.14 1 —
IR 566.65 1.1 —
IR 574.16 1.1 —
IR 581.67 1.1 —
IR 589.17 1.1 —
IR 596.68 1.1 —
🎓 Gids voor spectruminterpretatie (voor studenten)
Hoe lees je een IR-spectrum
  • 3200-3600 cm⁻¹ — O-H-rekvibratie (brede piek = waterstofbrug)
  • 2850-3000 cm⁻¹ — C-H-rekvibratie (sp³)
  • 1650-1750 cm⁻¹ — C=O-rekvibratie (ketonen, aldehyden, esters)
  • 1400-1600 cm⁻¹ — trillingen van de aromatische ring
  • 1000-1300 cm⁻¹ — C-O-rekvibratie (ethers, alcoholen)
  • Geen absorptie = geen functionele groep → vergelijk met een referentie

Bronnen: LibreTexts ↗, Silverstein (Spectrometric ID) ↗

📚 Wetenschappelijke referenties (Chicago Author-Date) (9 bronnen)

📚 De boekbibliografie moet nog worden gegenereerd. Gecureerde algemene leerboeken zijn hieronder beschikbaar; CAS-specifieke Google Books kunnen via het beheerpaneel worden opgehaald.

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2024. "NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69." Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
  2. Spectral Database for Organic Structure Determination (SDBS). 2024. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
  3. Ulrich, Eldon L., Hideo Akutsu, John F. Doreleijers, Yoko Harano, Yannis E. Ioannidis, Jundong Lin, Miron Livny, et al. 2008. "BioMagResBank." Nucleic Acids Research 36 (D1): D402–D408. [DOI ↗]
  4. Horai, Hisayuki, Masanori Arita, Shigehiko Kanaya, Yoshito Nihei, Tasuku Ikeda, Kazuhiro Suwa, Yuya Ojima, et al. 2010. "MassBank: A Public Repository for Sharing Mass Spectral Data for Life Sciences." Journal of Mass Spectrometry 45 (7): 703–714. [DOI ↗]
  5. Linstrom, P.J., and W.G. Mallard, eds. 2024. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. ↗
  6. McDonald, M. Shane, Mike McAvoy, and Ajit Bhalerao. 1988. "JCAMP-DX: A Standard Form for Exchange of Infrared Spectra in Computer Readable Form." Applied Spectroscopy 42 (1): 151–162. [DOI ↗]
  7. PubChem. 2024. "PubChem Compound Database." National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
📐 Fysisch-chemische eigenschappen (database) 6 velden MolGod-score: Geen bron
Eigenschap Waarde Eenheid Conditions Source
Smeltpunt -169.11 °C 1 atm
Kookpunt -103.72 °C 760 mmHg
Wateroplosbaarheid 0.131 g/L 25°C
Vlampunt -100.00 °C closed cup
Zelfontbrandingstemperatuur 450.00 °C in air
logP (octanol/water) 1.200 — 25°C
📚 Wetenschappelijke referenties (Chicago Author-Date) (12 bronnen)
  1. Haynes, William M., ed. 2024. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 105th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-032-55554-4. ↗
  2. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2024. "NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69." Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
  3. Yaws, Carl L. 2014. The Yaws Handbook of Physical Properties for Hydrocarbons and Chemicals. 2nd ed. Oxford: Gulf Professional Publishing.
  4. PubChem. 2024. "PubChem Compound Database." National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
  5. Marrero, J., and R. Gani. 2001. "Group-Contribution Based Estimation of Pure Component Properties." Fluid Phase Equilibria 183–184: 183–208. ↗
  6. Joback, K. G., and R. C. Reid. 1987. "Estimation of Pure-Component Properties from Group-Contributions." Chemical Engineering Communications 57 (1–6): 233–243. ↗
  7. Sangster, J. 1997. Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients: Fundamentals and Physical Chemistry. Chichester: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-97397-3.
  8. Mannhold, Raimund, and Han van de Waterbeemd. 2001. "Substructure and Whole Molecule Approaches for Calculating Log P." Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 15 (4): 337–354. ↗
  9. Perrin, Ditlev D., Boyd Dempsey, and E. P. Serjeant. 1981. pKa Prediction for Organic Acids and Bases. London: Chapman and Hall. ISBN 0-412-21090-5.
  10. Constantinou, Leonidas, and Rafiqul Gani. 1994. "New Group Contribution Method for Estimating Properties of Pure Compounds." AIChE Journal 40 (10): 1697–1710. ↗
  11. Ertl, Peter, Bernhard Rohde, and Paul Selzer. 2000. "Fast Calculation of Molecular Polar Surface Area as a Sum of Fragment-Based Contributions and Its Application to the Prediction of Drug Transport Properties." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 43 (20): 3714–3717. ↗
🔄 Omrekenaar voor concentratie-eenheden LIVE MolGod_UNITCONV_1

Voer de concentratie Ethylene in een willekeurige eenheid in — de rest wordt automatisch berekend.

MW: 28.05 g/mol · IUPAC Gold Book ↗

⚗️ Conversieformules + citaten (per formule)
ConversieFormuleNauwkeurigheidBron
% (w/v) ↔ molarityc (mol/L) = (% × 10) / MW±0.5% rel. when density ≈ 1.0 g/mLIUPAC (2019)
millimolar ↔ molarc (mol/L) = mM × 10⁻³ExactCohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
molarity (mol/L)c = n/V = (m/MW)/V±0.1% (depends on MW precision)IUPAC (2019)
parts per million (mg/L) ↔ molarityc (mol/L) = ppm / (1000 × MW); equivalently ppm = mg/L for dilute aqueous±1% (density-independent for dilute solutions)IUPAC (2019)
mg/mL ↔ molarityc (mol/L) = (mg/mL × 1000) / MW / 1000 = mg/mL / MW × 1±0.2%Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
g/L ↔ molarityc (mol/L) = (g/L) / MW±0.1% (depends on MW precision)Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
mmol/L ↔ molarityc (mol/L) = mmol/L × 10⁻³ExactCohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
Celsius ↔ KelvinT(K) = t(°C) + 273.15±0.01 K (ITS-90 scale)BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) (2019)
Celsius ↔ FahrenheitT(°F) = T(°C) × 9/5 + 32±0.1 °FThompson A, Taylor BN (2008)
density-corrected % ↔ molarityc (mol/L) = (%w/w × ρ × 10) / MW, ρ in g/mL±0.1% when ρ known to 3 decimalsCohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
📚 Bibliografie (8 gezaghebbende bronnen)
  1. Thompson A, Taylor BN (2008). Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI). NIST Special Publication 811 · DOI: 10.6028/NIST.SP.811-2008
    → Primary SI standard for US scientific usage
  2. Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry — The IUPAC Green Book. RSC Publishing, 3rd ed. · DOI: 10.1039/9781847557889 · ISBN: 978-0-85404-433-7
    → Canonical IUPAC guide for chemistry quantities/units
  3. BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) (2019). The International System of Units (SI), 9th edition. BIPM · ↗
    → International SI definitions (incl. redefined kilogram 2019)
  4. ISO/IEC (2022). Quantities and units — Part 1: General. International Organization for Standardization — ISO 80000-1:2022 · ↗
    → General rules for physical quantities and units
  5. ISO/IEC (2019). Quantities and units — Part 9: Physical chemistry and molecular physics. International Organization for Standardization — ISO 80000-9:2019 · ↗
    → Concentration / molality / amount-of-substance conventions
  6. Tiesinga E, Mohr PJ, Newell DB, Taylor BN (2021). CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93(2):025010 · DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010
    → Avogadro, gas constant, molar volume (2019 SI revision)
  7. IUPAC (2019). Compendium of Chemical Terminology — the IUPAC Gold Book (online). IUPAC · DOI: 10.1351/goldbook
    → Definitions of mass fraction, molality, normality, ppm, activity
  8. Mills IM, Cvitaš T, Homann K, Kallay N, Kuchitsu K (1988). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry. Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1st ed. · ISBN: 0-632-01773-5
    → Historical predecessor of IUPAC Green Book
Compatibiliteit met oplosmiddelenMolGod_SOLV_1

Schatting op basis van de oplosbaarheid in water en logP. Indicatieve gegevens — vervangen geen experimenteel onderzoek.

OplosmiddelCompatibiliteitOpmerkingenReferenties
Water~ MatigMatige logP
EtOH+ GoedEtOH — universeel polair oplosmiddel
Acetone+ GoedAceton — goed voor matig polaire verbindingen
DCM+ GoedDCM — goed voor apolaire verbindingen
DMSO+ GoedDMSO — sterk aprotisch oplosmiddel
THF+ GoedTHF — breed oplosbaarheidsbereik
Hexane- SlechtSlechte oplosbaarheid in hexaan
CHCl3+ GoedCHCl3 — goed voor matig polaire en apolaire verbindingen

Gegevensbronnen voor logP/oplosbaarheid: logP: 1.20

📚 Wetenschappelijke referenties voor oplosmiddelen (Chicago Author-Date) — klik om uit te klappen

Elk oplosmiddel wordt ondersteund door 5 onafhankelijke wetenschappelijke bronnen (NIST/CRC/IARC/Hansen/Reichardt/Smallwood/GESTIS). Volledige citaties hieronder.

Water · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. Rumble, John R., ed. 2023. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 104th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  2. International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam (IAPWS). 1997. "Release on the Static Dielectric Constant of Ordinary Water Substance." IAPWS R8-97. [link ↗]
  3. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220. [link ↗]
  4. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006834. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Water." GESTIS Substance Database. Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
EtOH · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. Rumble, John R., ed. 2023. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 104th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  2. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220. [link ↗]
  3. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183. [link ↗]
  4. Smallwood, Ian M. 1996. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties. London: Arnold. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-340-64578-9.X5000-9. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Ethanol." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
Acetone · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220. [link ↗]
  2. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  3. Rumble, John R., ed. 2023. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 104th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  4. Smallwood, Ian M. 1996. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties. London: Arnold. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Acetone." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
DCM · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Methane, dichloro- (CAS 75-09-2)." NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
  2. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1999. "Dichloromethane." IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans 71: 251–315. [link ↗]
  4. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Dichloromethane." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
DMSO · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. Wypych, George. 2019. Handbook of Solvents. Volume 1: Properties. 3rd ed. Toronto: ChemTec Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-02235-3. [link ↗]
  2. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. [link ↗]
  3. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  4. National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Methane, sulfinylbis- (CAS 67-68-5)." NIST Chemistry WebBook. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Dimethyl sulfoxide." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
THF · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. Armarego, Wilfred L. F., and Christina Li Lin Chai. 2009. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals. 6th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-567-8.50003-3. [link ↗]
  2. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  3. National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Furan, tetrahydro- (CAS 109-99-9)." NIST Chemistry WebBook. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
  4. Smallwood, Ian M. 1996. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties. London: Arnold. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Tetrahydrofuran." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
Hexane · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Hexane (CAS 110-54-3)." NIST Chemistry WebBook. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
  2. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  3. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. [link ↗]
  4. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1999. Toxicological Profile for n-Hexane. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "n-Hexane." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
CHCl3 · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1999. "Chloroform." IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans 73: 131–182. [link ↗]
  2. National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Methane, trichloro- (CAS 67-66-3)." NIST Chemistry WebBook. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
  3. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  4. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Chloroform." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
Oplosbaarheidstheorie (toegepast bij de voorspelling van compatibiliteit):
  1. Yalkowsky, Samuel H., and Shri C. Valvani. 1980. "Solubility and Partitioning I: Solubility of Nonelectrolytes in Water." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 69 (8): 912–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600690814 — General Solubility Equation (GSE): logS = 0.5 − logP − 0.01(MP−25).
  2. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006834 — HSP-triplet (dD, dP, dH) + Ra-formule.
  3. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220 — E_T(30) polarity scale, solwatochromia.
  4. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 — Eluotropic series, polarity index.
  5. PubChem Compound Database — CAS 74-85-1 lookup ↗ — logP (XLogP3), water solubility experimental + predicted.

Volledige bibliografie in het accordeon REFERENTIES (onderaan de pagina) — Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed., Author-Date.

🛡️ Veiligheid — CAS 74-85-1MolGod_SAFEHUB_MAIN
Mededeling over gegevensbeperkingen. De veiligheidsinformatie op deze pagina is uitsluitend ter informatie en vervangt geen volledig veiligheidsinformatieblad (SDS). Raadpleeg vóór gebruik van het product het actuele veiligheidsinformatieblad van de fabrikant en de GHS/CLP-richtlijnen. De CLP-indeling geldt voor de zuivere bulkstof, niet voor commerciële formuleringen.

GHS/CLP-indeling — Verordening (EG) nr. 1272/2008 + UN GHS Rev. 9 (2021).

⚠️ Gevaar (Danger)
GHS02 — Ontvlambaar
GHS02 Ontvlambaar
GHS04 — Gassen onder druk
GHS04 Gassen onder druk
GHS07 — Irriterend / schadelijk
GHS07 Irriterend / schadelijk

🚨 Gevarenaanduidingen (H)

  • H220 — Zeer licht ontvlambaar gas.
  • H336 — Kan slaperigheid of duizeligheid veroorzaken.

🛡 Voorzorgsmaatregelen (P)

  • P203 — Vóór gebruik alle veiligheidsinstructies raadplegen, lezen en opvolgen.

✓ Geharmoniseerde indeling overeenkomstig bijlage VI bij de CLP-verordening (EG) 1272/2008 (officiële, bindende indeling). Indexnummer: 601-010-00-3.

Referentie (Chicago): European Chemicals Agency. "ethylene, Index No. 601-010-00-3." In Table 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation), 23rd Adaptation to Technical Progress. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency, 2026. https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/annex-vi-to-clp.

⚠ IARC — Groep 3: niet in te delen wat betreft kankerverwekkendheid voor de mens (beoordeeld door IARC). (Onafhankelijke beoordeling van het bewijs voor kankerverwekkendheid door IARC/WHO — vult de bovenstaande CLP-indeling aan.)
Referentie (Chicago): IARC. 2026. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans: CAS 74-85-1. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. https://monographs.iarc.who.int/list-of-classifications/. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
Indeling uit de lokale MOL-GOD-lijst (snapshot) — niet geverifieerd tegen de actuele IARC-lijst. Verifiëren

Vertalingen: CLP-verordening (EG) 1272/2008, Bijlage III en IV. Gegevens: PubChem/NLM.

📚 Geconsolideerde wetenschappelijke referenties — Chicago Author-Date 10 bronnen

Referenties verzameld uit alle tabbladen van de Safety Hub. CAS: 74-85-1 · PubChem ↗

  1. Parlament Europejski i Rada UE. 2008. "Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 1272/2008 w sprawie klasyfikacji, oznakowania i pakowania substancji (CLP)." Dz.Urz. UE L 353. [↗] GHS, Regelgeving
  2. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2021. "Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), Ninth Revised Edition." United Nations, Geneva. [↗] GHS
  3. Goldfrank, Lewis R., Robert S. Hoffman, Mary Ann Howland, et al.. 2019. "Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 11th ed.." McGraw-Hill Education, New York. ISBN 978-1-25-985961-8. Pierwsza pomoc, Toksykologia
  4. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2023. "NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards (DHHS Publ. 2005-149)." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services / CDC, Cincinnati, OH. [↗] Pierwsza pomoc, PPE, Toksykologia
  5. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016. "EN 374-1:2016 — Protective gloves against dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms." CEN, Brussels. [↗] PPE
  6. UNECE. 2023. "European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR 2025)." United Nations, Geneva. [↗] Utylizacja, Regulacje
  7. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 2022. "NFPA 400 — Hazardous Materials Code." NFPA, Quincy, MA. [↗] Magazynowanie
  8. Urben, P.G. (ed.). 2017. "Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 8th ed.." Butterworth-Heinemann / Elsevier, Oxford. [↗] Magazynowanie
  9. Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska RP. 2023. "Baza danych o produktach i opakowaniach oraz o gospodarce odpadami (BDO)." Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska, Warszawa. [↗] Utylizacja
  10. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC / WHO). 2024. "IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans — List of Classifications." WHO, Lyon. [↗] Toksykologia

Tabbladen met eigen referenties (Emergency, PPE, Storage, Waste) bevatten aanvullende bibliografische vermeldingen binnen hun respectieve secties.

📈 Analytische statistiek (t-test · RSD · Grubbs · Q-Dixon) ICH Q2

Plak een reeks herhaalde metingen (CSV of één getal per regel). De calculator berekent het gemiddelde, de standaardafwijking en 95% CI, en detecteert uitschieters (Grubbs + Dixon Q).

Scheidingsteken: komma, spatie, tab, nieuwe regel. Minimaal 3 metingen.
📐 Statistische formules
  • x̄ = Σxᵢ / n — rekenkundig gemiddelde
  • s² = Σ(xᵢ - x̄)² / (n-1) — steekproefvariantie
  • s = √s² — standaardafwijking
  • RSD% = (s / x̄) × 100% — relatieve standaardafwijking
  • CI₉₅ = x̄ ± t(0.05, n-1) × s / √n — Student's t
  • G = |xᵢ - x̄| / s — Grubbs-test
  • Q = |xsuspect - xnearest| / |xmax - xmin| — Dixon Q-test

Bron: ICH Q2(R2) Validation of Analytical Procedures · ICH PDF ↗

🔬 HPLC/GC-methoden (3 metod)
📄
Identification of Phenolic Compounds in the Invasive Plants Staghorn Sumac and Himalayan Balsam: Impact of Time and Solvent on the Extraction of Phenolics and Extract Evaluation on Germination Inhibition
HPLC-DADPlants202488% ✓CC-BYResearch method (specificity, robustness)
Kolom: C18
Fase: mobile phases were used to separate the phenolic compounds: A (0
Detectie: UV 530 nm
Debiet: 0.60 mL/min
Temp.: 20.0 °C
Inj.: 20 μL
Gradient: program described by Mikulic-Petkovsek et al
Mikulic-Petkovsek M, Ravnjak E, Rusjan D. Identification of Phenolic Compounds in the Invasive Plants Staghorn Sumac and Himalayan Balsam: Impact of Time and Solvent on the Extraction of Phenolics and Extract Evaluation on Germination Inhibition. Plants. 2024;13:3339. doi:10.3390/plants13233339
🔗 DOI🏠 PMC📚 PubMed📄 PDF
An HPLC-MS-DAD analysis of phenolic compounds was carried out on the extracts of staghorn sumac (Rhus typhina L.) and Himalayan balsam (Impatiens glandulifera Royle). This study focuses on the influence of solvent type and extraction time on the phenolic extraction efficiency from both invasive plants. Methanol extraction resulted in a 4.2 times higher content of hydroxybenzoic acids, a 3.7 times higher content of hydroxycinnamic acids, a 3.2 times higher content of flavanols, a 9.6 times higher content of flavanones, and an 8.7 times higher content of flavonols in the Himalayan balsam extract compared to aqueous extraction. Anthocyanins were only detected in the alcohol-based extraction. In comparison, the aqueous extraction from staghorn sumac resulted in a higher yield of total hydroxybenzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids, and flavonols, while the methanol extraction resulted in a 1.4-fold lower total polyphenolic content compared to the aqueous extraction. The type of solvent had no significant effect on the total content of flavanols in staghorn sumac. Extraction time considerably affected the total phenolic content in both plant extracts. After 84 h of extraction, the staghorn sumac extract showed a 3.5-fold increase in the total phenolic content compared to the initial measurement. In contrast, the Himalayan balsam extract showed a 40% decrease in the total phenolic content after 84 h. The Himalayan balsam extract reduced the germination of perennial ryegrass seeds by 55%, while the staghorn sumac extract reduced it by 80%. Both extracts also inhibited shoot and root growth of perennial ryegrass, although the Himalayan balsam extract at a concentration of 0.125 g/mL stimulated root growth of perennial ryegrass. The strategic use of invasive alien plants could be an effective approach to control their spread in the environment, potentially reducing management costs. The effectiveness of this approach depends largely on the type and content of allelochemicals pr...
L.Roylephytochemistryphenolic componentsextraction efficiencyinvasive plant speciesgermination reduction
📄
Standardization of Juniperus macrocarpa Sibt. & Sm. and Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb. Extracts with Carbohydrate Digestive Enzyme Inhibitory and Antioxidant Activities
HPLCIranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research202190% ✓CC-BYResearch method (specificity, robustness)
Kolom: CN, 5 μm
Fase: mobile phase contained 10% solvent A (acetonitrile:water: formic acid, 50:50:0
Detectie: UV 735 nm
Debiet: 1.00 mL/min
Temp.: 25.0 °C
Inj.: 20 μL
Gradient: system was started from the mobile phase contained 10% solvent…
Gök H, Orhan N, Özüpek B, Pekacar S, Selvi Ş, Orhan D. Standardization of Juniperus macrocarpa Sibt. & Sm. and Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb. Extracts with Carbohydrate Digestive Enzyme Inhibitory and Antioxidant Activities. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research : IJPR. 2021;20:441-455. doi:10.22037/ijpr.2021.114838.15055
🔗 DOI🏠 PMC📚 PubMed📄 PDF
Juniperus species growing in Turkey are used for various medicinal purposes in traditional folk medicine. We aimed to evaluate in-vitro antidiabetic (α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition assays), antiobesity (pancreatic lipase inhibition assay), and antioxidant (ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging activities, ferric reducing activity, metal chelating activity, and phosphomolybdenum assay) activities of the extracts obtained from branches, leaves, and fruits of Juniperus macrocarpa and Juniperus excelsa. The branch (IC50 = 67.1 ± 1.7 µg/mL) and leaf ethyl acetate extracts (IC50 = 83.4 ± 0.8 µg/mL) of J. macrocarpa exhibited the strongest activity on the α-glucosidase enzyme. Besides that, J. excelsa leaf methanol extract exerted remarkable α-amylase inhibitory activity (IC50 = 950.1 ± 3.5 µg/mL). Only J. macrocarpa branch and J. excelsa leaf ethyl acetate extract slightly inhibited pancreatic lipase enzyme with 2963.3 ± 736.4 and 2343 ± 557.8 µg/mL IC50 values, respectively. The RP-HPLC-DAD analysis results demonstrated that the more active J. macrocarpa extracts are richer in agathisflavone, amentoflavone, and umbelliferone than J. excelsa extracts. With this study, it is concluded that J. macrocarpa branch and leaf ethyl acetate extracts may be a new source of α-glucosidase enzyme inhibitory activity and agathisflavone, amentoflavone can be used in the standardization of the extracts.
AntidiabeticantioxidantJuniperus macrocarpaJuniperus excelsaRP-HPLC
📄
Phytochemical Characterization of Saudi Mint and Its Mediating Effect on the Production of Silver Nanoparticles and Its Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities
HPLCPlants202387% ✓CC-BYResearch method (specificity, robustness)
Kolom: C18, 5 μm
Fase: mobile phase, two buffers were used: buffer A (military Q water and…
Detectie: UV 280 nm
Debiet: 0.90 mL/min
Temp.: 30.0 °C
Inj.: 5 μL
Qanash H, Bazaid A, Binsaleh N, Alharbi B, Alshammari N, Qahl S, et al. Phytochemical Characterization of Saudi Mint and Its Mediating Effect on the Production of Silver Nanoparticles and Its Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities. Plants. 2023;12:2177. doi:10.3390/plants12112177
🔗 DOI🏠 PMC📚 PubMed📄 PDF
The green synthesis of nanoparticles (NPs) is attracting enormous attention as a new area of study that encompasses the development and discovery of new agents for their utilization in different fields, such as pharmaceuticals and food. Nowadays, the use of plants, particularly medicinal plants, for the creation of NPs has emerged as a safe, ecofriendly, rapid, and simple approach. Therefore, the present study aimed to use the Saudi mint plant as a medicinal plant for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and to evaluate the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of AgNPs compared to mint extract (ME). A phenolic and flavonoid analysis that was conducted by using HPLC indicated the presence of numerous compounds in the ME. Through an HPLC analysis, chlorogenic acid at a concentration of 7144.66 µg/mL was the main detected component in the ME, while catechin, gallic acid, naringenin, ellagic acid, rutin, daidzein, cinnamic acid, and hesperetin were identified in varying concentrations. AgNPs were synthesized by using ME and were confirmed via UV–visible spectroscopy at 412 nm of the maximum absorption. The mean diameter of the synthesized AgNPs was measured by TEM to be 17.77 nm. Spectra obtained by using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy indicated that silver was the main element formation in the created AgNPs. The presence of various functional groups, analyzed by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), indicated that the mint extract was responsible for reducing Ag+ to Ag0. The spherical structure of the synthesized AgNPs was confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Furthermore, the ME showed reduced antimicrobial activity (a zone of inhibition of 30, 24, 27, 29, and 22 mm) compared with the synthesized AgNPs (a zone of inhibition of 33, 25, 30, 32, 32, and 27 mm) against B. subtilis, E. faecalis, E. coli, P. vulgaris, and C. albicans, respectively. The minimum inhibitory concentration of the AgNPs was lower than that of the ME for all of t...
Saudi mintplant natural productsilver nanoparticles (AgNPs)antimicrobialantioxidant
📈 Methodevalidatie (ICH Q2)

Geen validatiegegevens. Neem contact op met de auteur van de methode.

Parameters volgens: ICH Q2(R2) ↗

📋 Methodevergelijking
Techniek Kolom Analysetijd Detectie Mobiele fase Bron
HPLC-DAD C18 — UV 530 nm mobile phases were used to separate the phenolic… DOI ↗
HPLC CN — UV 735 nm mobile phase contained 10% solvent A (acetonitrile:water: formic… DOI ↗
HPLC C18 — UV 280 nm mobile phase, two buffers were used: buffer A… DOI ↗
🔧 Probleemoplossing HPLC/GC
Brede pieken / tailing
Oorzaken: Versleten kolom, verkeerde pH van de mobiele fase, kolomoverbelasting, dood volume
Oplossing: Vervang de kolom, controleer de buffer-pH (±0.2), verlaag het injectievolume, controleer de verbindingen
Basislijndrift
Oorzaken: Verontreinigde mobiele fase, gradiëntproblemen, onstabiele temperatuur
Oplossing: Ontgas de fase, filtreer 0.22 µm, stabiliseer de kolomtemperatuur, spoel het systeem
Geen piek
Oorzaken: Verkeerde golflengte, stof elueert niet, thermische ontleding, verkeerde fase
Oplossing: Controleer λmax, verleng de gradiënt, verlaag de temperatuur, wijzig de mobiele fase
Spookpieken (ghost peaks)
Oorzaken: Systeemverontreiniging, carry-over, verontreinigde vials
Oplossing: Reinig het systeem (MeOH/H₂O), gebruik nieuwe vials, injecteer een blanco
Lage terugvinding
Oorzaken: Adsorptie aan de wanden, onvoldoende extractie, ontleding
Oplossing: Voeg IS toe, silaniseer glaswerk, optimaliseer de extractie, controleer de stabiliteit

Bronnen: Snyder, Kirkland & Dolan ↗, Waters ↗

📊 Validatie van de HPLC-methode (ICH Q2(R1)) PARTIAL

3 metrics need experimental data

Parameter Waarde Eenheid ICH Q2-criterium Status
Lineariteit (R²) geen gegevens unitless R² ≥ 0.999 (≥0.99 voor bioanalytische methoden) —
LOD (S/N = 3:1) geen gegevens ng/mL S/N ≥ 3:1 (laagste detecteerbare concentratie) —
LOQ (S/N = 10:1) geen gegevens ng/mL S/N ≥ 10:1 (LOQ ≥ 3×LOD doorgaans) —
Precisie (RSD intraday, n=6) geen gegevens % RSD RSD ≤ 2% (intraday) / ≤ 3% (interday) voor de API —
Juistheid (recovery, 3 niveaus) geen gegevens % (target 100±2%) Recovery 98-102% (target 100%) —
Lineariteitsbereik geen gegevens bijv. 0.1-100 ng/mL Min. 80-120% van de nominale concentratie —
Selectiviteit/Specificiteit geen gegevens qualitative Geen interferentie — analytpiek volledig gescheiden (Rs ≥ 2.0) —
Robuustheid (robustness) geen gegevens RSD < 2% bij ±5% variatie RSD < 2% bij kleine parametervariaties —
Legend: ✓ PASS ⚠ CAUTION ✗ FAIL — NO_DATA
📚 Wetenschappelijke referenties (Chicago Author-Date) — klik om uit te klappen

Standaarden voor validatie van analytische methoden — 4 onafhankelijke bronnen (ICH + USP + AOAC + Snyder).

  1. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). 2005. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1). ICH Expert Working Group. [link ↗] — Gold-standard ICH guideline — accepted by EMA, FDA, MHLW, NMPA
  2. United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Convention. 2024. USP General Chapter <621> Chromatography. USP-NF 2024 ed. USP. [link ↗]
  3. AOAC International. 2016. Appendix F: Guidelines for Standard Method Performance Requirements. AOAC INTERNATIONAL. [link ↗] — AOAC SMPR — alternative to ICH Q2 for food/dietary supplements
  4. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-16754-0. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 [link ↗] — Industry standard textbook — Chapter 11 covers method validation
  5. Snyder, L. R., J. J. Kirkland, and J. L. Glajch. 1997. Practical HPLC Method Development. 2nd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-00703-6. — Classic method-development reference (DryLab heritage).
  6. Rozet, Eric, et al.. 2013. Analysis of recent pharmaceutical regulatory documents on analytical method validation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.111 [link ↗] — Comparison of FDA / EMA / ICH validation expectations — used for ICH Q2(R1) interpretation.
  7. Heyden, Yvan Vander, et al.. 2009. Robustness of pharmaceutical liquid chromatographic methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.10.052 [link ↗] — Plackett-Burman design for robustness — basis of ICH Q2 §3.7.
  8. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists. 2nd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-119-31378-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793 [link ↗] — Modern (UHPLC) update of validation chapter — practical RSD/LOD examples.
  9. Meyer, Veronika R.. 2010. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. 5th ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-68218-0. — European pharmacopeial perspective — complements USP/AOAC.
  10. Kazakevich, Yuri V., and Rosario LoBrutto, eds.. 2007. HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists. Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 978-0-471-68162-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470087954 [link ↗] — Pharma-focused validation case studies (specificity, robustness).
  11. European Medicines Agency (EMA). 2011. Guideline on bioanalytical method validation EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009. EMA Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. [link ↗] — EMA bioanalytical companion to ICH Q2(R1) for clinical samples.

· ⚠ Regelgevende waarschuwingen SVHC/REACH ↑

🔧 HPLC-troubleshooting — beslissingsboom 6 veelvoorkomende problemen

Diagnostiek van de 12 meest voorkomende HPLC-problemen met een beslissingsboom (5 stappen per probleem). Bron: Snyder/Kirkland/Dolan 3rd ed. Chapter 17 + LCGC LC Troubleshooting columns 1989-2024.

Verbrede pieken (broad peaks) medium

Symptoom: Alle pieken op het chromatogram zijn breder dan verwacht (FWHM > 2× normaal)

🔍 Diagnostische boom:
  1. 1. Controleer of alle pieken verbreed zijn of slechts sommige
    → JA: Alle → instrumenteel probleem (kolom of systeem)
    → NEE: Slechts sommige → chemisch probleem (interactie met de kolom voor specifieke analyten)
  2. 2. Verwissel met een testkolom — verdwijnt het probleem?
    → JA: KOLOM versleten — packing beschadigd, void in de eerste mm. Vervang hem.
    → NEE: Probleem in het LC-systeem
  3. 3. Controleer het dode volume (dead volume) — injectielus, verbindingen, detector
    → JA: Lus > 100 µL voor een 4.6 mm kolom of losse verbindingen → vervang de ferrules, kort de leidingen in
    → NEE: Diagnostiek voortzetten
  4. 4. Temperatuurtest: verhoog de kolom van 25°C naar 40°C
    → JA: Smallere pieken → massatransferkinetiek te traag (verhoog T)
    → NEE: Continue
  5. 5. Controleer het debiet t.o.v. het van Deemter-optimum voor deze kolom
    → JA: Optimum voor 4.6mm/5µm = 1.0 mL/min, voor 2.1mm/3µm = 0.4 mL/min
    → NEE: Continue
⚠️ Typische oorzaken:
  • Kolom versleten (>2000 injecties zonder voorkolom)
  • Dood volume van het systeem > 100 µL (verkeerde lus, lange leidingen, losse ferrules)
  • Temperatuur te laag (massatransferkinetiek)
  • Debiet buiten het van Deemter-optimum
  • Monsteroplosmiddel sterker dan mobiele fase A
✓ Oplossingen:
  • ✓ Vervang de kolom (bij >2000 injecties)
  • ✓ Controleer alle verbindingen — houd de leidingen zo kort mogelijk
  • ✓ Verhoog de kolomtemperatuur naar 40°C (als de stof stabiel is)
  • ✓ Verlaag het debiet naar het van Deemter-optimum
  • ✓ Los het monster op in mobiele fase A (niet in puur organisch)
Piektailing (tailing, T > 1.5) high

Symptoom: Pieken hebben een verlengde "staart" aan de late-elutiezijde (asymmetrie T = b/a > 1.5 volgens USP)

🔍 Diagnostische boom:
  1. 1. Bevat de stof basische groepen (amino, pyridine)?
    → JA: Ja → silanolinteracties! Voeg 0.1% TFA of 5-10 mM TEA toe aan mobiele fase A.
    → NEE: Continue
  2. 2. Controleer de pH van de mobiele fase t.o.v. de pKa van de stof
    → JA: pH = pKa ± 1 → gedeeltelijke ionisatie, peak split. Verplaats de pH ≥ 2 eenheden weg van de pKa.
    → NEE: Continue
  3. 3. Controleer de leeftijd van de kolom (>1500 injecties?)
    → JA: Ja → blootgelegde silanolen (column bleed). Vervang door een kolom met hogere endcapping (XTerra, Symmetry).
    → NEE: Continue
  4. 4. Bevat het monster metalen (Fe, Cu uit glazen flesjes)?
    → JA: Ja → gebruik kleurloze type II-flesjes of PFA. Voeg 0.1mM EDTA toe aan het monster.
    → NEE: Continue
⚠️ Typische oorzaken:
  • Silanolinteracties (basische analyt + vrije silanolen van silicagel)
  • pH op de grens van de pKa van de analyt (peak split)
  • Oude kolom (column bleed, hoge silanolactiviteit)
  • Metalen in het monster (chelatie → tailing)
  • Kolomoverbelasting (>50 µg op een 4.6mm kolom)
✓ Oplossingen:
  • ✓ Voeg 0.1% TFA (UV) of 0.1% mierenzuur (LC-MS) toe aan mobiele fase A
  • ✓ Kies een kolom met hoogzuivere endcapping: Waters XBridge BEH, Phenomenex Kinetex
  • ✓ Werk bij een pH ≥ 2 eenheden weg van de pKa
  • ✓ 0.1mM EDTA aan het monster (Fe/Cu-chelatie)
  • ✓ Verlaag het injectievolume naar ≤ 20 µL voor een 4.6mm kolom
Basislijndrift (baseline drift) medium

Symptoom: De basislijn stijgt of daalt systematisch gedurende >5 minuten

🔍 Diagnostische boom:
  1. 1. Gebruik je een gradiënt (B% neemt toe)?
    → JA: Ja → verschillende absorptie van fasen A vs B bij dλ. Oplosmiddelwisseling in de UV-cutoff. Controleer de UV-absorptie van het % organisch.
    → NEE: Verder (isocratisch)
  2. 2. Controleer de kolomtemperatuur — is deze stabiel tot ±0.5°C?
    → JA: Ja (stabiel) → verder
    → NEE: Instabiel → schakel de kolomthermostaat in (>25°C gecontroleerd)
  3. 3. Test: schakel de autosampler uit, laat alleen pomp+kolom+detector draaien
    → JA: De drift verdwijnt → contaminatie van de autosampler (reinig de naald, het septum)
    → NEE: Continue
  4. 4. Controleer de leeftijd van de lamp (D2 voor UV)
    → JA: Ja (>1500 uur) → vervang de lamp
    → NEE: Continue
⚠️ Typische oorzaken:
  • Gradiëntelutie met verschillende UV-cutoff van de fasen
  • Instabiele kolomtemperatuur
  • Autosampler-contaminatie van de naald/septum
  • UV-lamp oud (>1500h)
  • Detector-flowcel vervuild
  • Kolom niet geëquilibreerd (<10 kolomvolumes)
✓ Oplossingen:
  • ✓ Kolom voor-equilibreren gedurende 10-15 kolomvolumes bij 100% A
  • ✓ Kolomthermostaat aan, T 30-40°C stabiel
  • ✓ Reinig de detector-flowcel met een 50:50 ACN:H2O-oplossing
  • ✓ Vervang de D2-lamp indien >1500h
  • ✓ Gebruik baseline subtraction (Chromeleon, native Empower-functie)
Geen piek / verloren piek (no peak) critical

Symptoom: De verwachte analytpiek verschijnt niet op het chromatogram

🔍 Diagnostische boom:
  1. 1. Heeft de injectie daadwerkelijk plaatsgevonden?
    → JA: Controleer het autosampler-log, de pompdruk (moet dalen tijdens de injectie)
    → NEE: Autosampler-probleem → controleer de loop, de naald, het monster in de vial
  2. 2. Zit het monster in de vial (correct volume, niet verdampt)?
    → JA: Continue
    → NEE: Geen monster — opnieuw pipetteren
  3. 3. Monsterstabiliteit — >24h geleden bereid?
    → JA: Ja → degradatie. Bereid een vers monster opnieuw.
    → NEE: Continue
  4. 4. Controleer de detectiegolflengte t.o.v. de λmax van de stof
    → JA: Detectie bij λ komt NIET overeen met λmax → geen signaal. Scan DAD 200-400nm.
    → NEE: Continue
  5. 5. Test: injecteer een zuivere standaard (van bekende concentratie, vers)
    → JA: De standaard geeft een piek → probleem met het monster (matrix, derivatisering)
    → NEE: Ook geen piek met de standaard → systeemprobleem (kolom, fase, gradiënt)
⚠️ Typische oorzaken:
  • Monster niet uit de vial genomen (autosampler-bug)
  • Monster gedegradeerd (>24h pH/temp/licht)
  • Detectie bij de verkeerde golflengte
  • Verkeerde mobiele fase (bijv. vergeten TFA)
  • Kolom omgekeerd / verkeerde stationaire fase
  • De stof elueert op het front (V0) → niet vastgehouden, niet zichtbaar
✓ Oplossingen:
  • ✓ Bereid een vers monster opnieuw volgens het exacte protocol
  • ✓ UV-Vis DAD-scan 200-400nm + zoeken naar λmax
  • ✓ Controleer de samenstelling van de mobiele fase — is TFA toegevoegd?
  • ✓ Test de omgekeerde kolomrichting (voorzichtig!)
  • ✓ Voor retentie <1 min — verlaag de % B, MeOH in plaats van ACN
  • ✓ Controleer de tabel "expected_rt" in wp_molgod_hplc_methods
Druk te hoog (pressure too high) critical

Symptoom: Pompdruk > 80% van het kolommaximum of systeem-shutdown met high-pressure error

🔍 Diagnostische boom:
  1. 1. Controleer of de kolom correct is aangesloten (richting van de pijl)
    → JA: OK
    → NEE: Kolom omgekeerd → draai om (nooit "achterstevoren" gebruiken)
  2. 2. Test: verwijder de kolom uit het systeem, laat alleen pomp+detector draaien
    → JA: Druk daalt naar <50 bar → probleem in de kolom (verstopt)
    → NEE: Druk blijft hoog → in-line filter verstopt, frit vervuild
  3. 3. Controleer het pre-kolomfilter (in-line frit)
    → JA: Vervuild en bruin → vervangen
    → NEE: Continue
  4. 4. Spoel de kolom terug met 50:50 ACN:H2O zonder de kolom — verdwijnt het?
    → JA: Deeltjes vast in de eerste mm — een flush van 30 min kan het herstellen
    → NEE: Vervang de kolom
⚠️ Typische oorzaken:
  • In-line filter (frit) verstopt met deeltjes
  • Buffer salting-out (precipitatie bij hoog %B)
  • Monster bevat zwevende deeltjes (filtreer 0.22 µm vóór injectie)
  • Kolom verstopt (column bed compaction)
  • Gradiënt met bufferfase + veel organisch → zoutprecipitatie
✓ Oplossingen:
  • ✓ Filtreer het monster ALTIJD door 0.22 µm PVDF vóór injectie
  • ✓ Vervang het in-line filter elke 100 injecties (of wanneer de druk >20% stijgt)
  • ✓ Gebruik GEEN >20mM fosfaatbuffer + >70% ACN (het zout slaat neer)
  • ✓ Spoel de kolom 30 min met 50:50 ACN:H2O in de omgekeerde richting (wanneer de fabrikant dit toestaat)
  • ✓ Pre-kolom 4×3mm ter bescherming van de hoofdkolom
Spookpieken (ghost peaks) high

Symptoom: Onverklaarde pieken op het chromatogram die afwezig zijn in de kalibratie

🔍 Diagnostische boom:
  1. 1. Test: blanco injectie (zuiver monsteroplosmiddel)
    → JA: Er verschijnt een spookpiek → contaminatie van het systeem of de eluenten
    → NEE: Verschijnt alleen bij het monster → matrix
  2. 2. Groeit de spookpiek met de gradiënt (elueert bij hoog %B)?
    → JA: Ja → overladen kolom of sterk vastgehouden uit een vorige run
    → NEE: Onafhankelijk van de gradiënt → autosampler carryover
  3. 3. Increase carryover wash (between injections)
    → JA: Helpt → carryover was de oorzaak. Sterker wasprotocol.
    → NEE: Continue
  4. 4. Injectie van zuiver water — is er een piek?
    → JA: Ja → contaminatie van de waterbron (organische stoffen uit het DI-systeem)
    → NEE: Continue
⚠️ Typische oorzaken:
  • Carryover in de autosampler-naald/loop
  • Contaminatie van het eluens (zelfs HPLC-grade)
  • Sterk vastgehouden componenten uit vorige runs
  • Plastic in de vials (ftalaten, PEG uit de doppen)
  • DI-water onvoldoende gezuiverd
✓ Oplossingen:
  • ✓ Versterk het wasprotocol: 100% B → 100% A → 50:50 (3 cycli)
  • ✓ Sterke was: 100% DMSO of 100% MeOH vóór de kalibratie
  • ✓ Filtreer de eluenten door 0.22 µm PTFE bij twijfel
  • ✓ Gebruik amberkleurig glas + doppen met Teflon-coating voor monsters
  • ✓ Periodieke gradiëntramp naar 100% B gedurende 10 min (clean-out)
📚 Wetenschappelijke referenties (Chicago Author-Date) — klik om uit te klappen
  1. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons. Chapter 17 (Troubleshooting) pp. 559-616. ISBN 978-0-470-16754-0. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 [link ↗]
  2. Dolan, John W.. 2014. LC Troubleshooting (monthly column 1989-2024). LCGC North America. [link ↗] — John Dolan 35-letnia seria miesięcznych artykułów problemowych
  3. Kromidas, Stavros. 2017. HPLC Made to Measure: A Practical Handbook for Optimization. 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-31377-1. — Praktyczny przewodnik problem-solving dla labs analitycznych
  4. Dolan, John W.. 2013. When to Modify Method Conditions. 192-199. [link ↗] — Decision flow for changing flow rate / temperature / %B vs swapping columns.
  5. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists. 2nd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-119-31378-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793 [link ↗] — Chapter 9 covers troubleshooting modern UHPLC systems (sub-2 µm particles).
  6. Meyer, Veronika R.. 2010. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. 5th ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-68218-0. — Solid step-by-step problem isolation chapter (eluents, columns, instruments).
  7. Snyder, L. R., J. J. Kirkland, and J. L. Glajch. 1997. Practical HPLC Method Development. 2nd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-00703-6. — Method-development companion volume with troubleshooting cross-refs.
  8. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. The new physical chemistry of HPLC. 1764-1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗] — Theoretical basis for diagnosing efficiency losses (mass-transfer, eddy diffusion).
  9. Heyden, Yvan Vander, et al.. 2009. Robustness of pharmaceutical liquid chromatographic methods. 2120-2129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.10.052 [link ↗] — How to diagnose method failures vs. system failures (Plackett-Burman).
  10. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. 100 Years of Chromatography. 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-33473-5. — Historical context for ghost-peak phenomenology (silica chemistry).
  11. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial. 519-531. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03506 [link ↗]
  12. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. The new physical chemistry of HPLC. 1764-1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗]
  13. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations. 1167-1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026 [link ↗]
  14. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. 100 Years of Chromatography. 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-33473-5.
  15. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography. 8525-8531. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z [link ↗]
📚 Technische FAQ — Ethylene (5) MolGod_TECHFAQ_1
❓ Jak przygotować roztwór standardowy etylenu (C2H4) o stężeniu 1 mM?
Aby przygotować roztwór standardowy etylenu o stężeniu 1 mM, należy obliczyć masę substancji potrzebną do sporządzenia roztworu. Masa molowa etylenu wynosi 28.05 g/mol. Dla 1 litra roztworu (1 dm³) o stężeniu 1 mM (1 mmol/dm³): masa etylenu = 1 mmol * 28.05 g/mol = 0.02805 g. Rozpuścić 0.02805 g etylenu w odpowiednim rozpuszczalniku (np. heksanie) i uzupełnić do objętości 1 litra.
Nuttig?
❓ Jak przechowywać etylen, aby zachować jego stabilność?
Etylen należy przechowywać w temperaturze poniżej -60°C (np. w ciekłym azocie) lub jako gaz pod ciśnieniem w butlach stalowych, z dala od światła i źródeł ciepła. Wilgotność powietrza nie powinna przekraczać 50%, aby uniknąć reakcji z wodą.
Nuttig?
❓ Jaka metoda analityczna jest najlepsza do oznaczania etylenu w próbce?
Najlepszą metodą analityczną dla etylenu jest chromatografia gazowa (GC) z detektorem płomieniowo-jonizacyjnym (FID), ze względu na niską masę molową (28.05 g/mol) i lotność substancji. LogP etylenu wynosi około -1, co wskazuje na umiarkowaną rozpuszczalność w fazie stacjonarnej GC.
Nuttig?
❓ Jakie są główne reakcje i niezgodności chemiczne etylenu?
Etylen jest bardzo reaktywnym alkenem. Reaguje z utleniaczami (np. nadtlenkiem wodoru), tworząc epoksydy, oraz z halogenkami (np. Cl2), dając dihalogenki. Nie należy go przechowywać w obecności silnych kwasów lub zasad, które mogą prowadzić do niepożądanych reakcji addycji.
Nuttig?
❓ W jakich praktycznych zastosowaniach laboratoryjnych wykorzystuje się etylen?
Etylen jest używany w syntezie organicznej jako substrat do produkcji glikoli, alkoholi i estrów. W laboratoriach stosuje się go również do polimeryzacji (np. etylenu z innymi monomerami) oraz jako gaz nośny w chromatografii gazowej.
Nuttig?
🧮 Laboratoriumcalculators (8) MolGod_LABCALC_1
Verdunning (C₁V₁=C₂V₂)
Molariteit (M=n/V)
pH-buffer (Henderson-Hasselbalch)
Beer-Lambert (A=εcl)
Massa → Mol
Concentratie % → M
ppm → mg/L
Temperatuur C↔F↔K

Geverifieerde formules: IUPAC Gold Book ↗, DOI ↗

📊 Spectroscopische spectradatabases MolGod_SPECDB_3
🏷️ Etikettengenerator (QR) MolGod_LABEL_1
Etheen• ETHYLENE / Ethene• CAS: 74-85-1• Formule: C2H4• Massa: 28.05 g/molGEVAARGHS-GEVARENAANDUIDINGEN:H220: Zeer licht ontvlambaar gas.H336: Kan slaperigheid of duizeligheid veroorzaken.P203: Vóór gebruik alle veiligheidsinstructies raadplegen, lezen en opvolgen.Uitsluitend voor laboratoriumgebruik!DH ScientificScience first. Commerce as consequence.Batchnr.: Nettogewicht: Prod.:
ADMET — farmacologisch profiel
ADMET-voorspellingen worden geladen…
Historische incidenten (CSB/EPA/Bretherick)

Deze database bevat uitsluitend ernstige industriële en laboratoriumincidenten (CSB, EPA RMP, Bretherick). Het ontbreken van een record betekent NIET dat de stof veilig is — de database is onvolledig.

Historische incidenten (1)

  1. 1989-10-23 Pasadena, Texas, USA (Phillips 66 Houston Chemical Complex, HCC) Catastrofaal explosion
    Stoffen: Ethylene (high-pressure HDPE feed) (CAS 74-85-1) + Oxygen / atmospheric air ingress (CAS 7782-44-7)
    23 ofiar smiertelnych 314 rannych

    Podczas konserwacji reaktora HDPE settling leg (rurociag 22") doszlo do otwarcia zaworu DEMCO w trakcie procedury maintenance. Uwolnienie ~38 ton mieszaniny etylen/izobutan/wodor stworzylo chmure gazowo-powietrzna, ktora zaplonila po ~90 sekundach (zrodlo nieustalone definitywnie). VCE o sile 2.4 ton TNT, zniszczyl HDPE complex.

    Grondoorzaak: Single-block valve zamiast double-block-and-bleed. Procedury LO/TO niewlasciwe (compressed air zasilajacy aktuatory zaworow podlaczony do "open" zamiast "close" portow). Brak gas detection w okolicy reactora. Unauthorized work przy non-routine maintenance.
    Geleerde lessen: Double-block-and-bleed valve standard dla high-pressure reactor isolation. Kierunek pneumatic actuators musi byc fail-safe. OSHA PSM standard 29 CFR 1910.119 (1992) jest bezposrednim wynikiem tego incydentu.
    Primaire bron: OSHA + Phillips 66 + peer-reviewed Process Safety literature
    Bibliografie (Chicago auteur-datum)
    • U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 1990. The Phillips 66 Company Houston Chemical Complex Explosion and Fire. Washington, DC: OSHA.
    • Atherton, John, and Frederic Gil. 2008. Incidents That Define Process Safety. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-AIChE.
    • Khan, Faisal I., and S. A. Abbasi. 1999. "Major Accidents in Process Industries and an Analysis of Causes and Consequences." Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 12 (5): 361-378.
📚 Gegevensbronnen over incidenten
  1. U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB). 2024. "CSB Incident Investigation Reports." Washington, DC: CSB. 🔗
  2. U.S. EPA / NOAA. 2024. "CAMEO Chemicals Database." Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 🔗
  3. BARPI (French Bureau for Analysis of Industrial Risks and Pollutions). 2024. "ARIA Database of Industrial Accident Reports." Saint-Denis: BARPI/DGPR. 🔗
  4. U.S. OSHA. 2024. "OSHA Accident Investigation Reports." Washington, DC: Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 🔗
  5. Urben, Peter G., ed. 2017. Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 8th ed. Oxford: Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-08-100971-2.
  6. Mannan, Sam, ed. 2005. Lees' Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 3rd ed. Oxford: Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-7506-7555-0.
  7. Hollnagel, Erik. 2004. Barriers and Accident Prevention. Aldershot: Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-2271-9.
  8. Kletz, Trevor A. 2003. "Lessons from Disasters — How Organizations Have No Memory and Accidents Recur." Process Safety and Environmental Protection 81 (4): 283–287. 🔗
📚 Overzicht van de wetenschappelijke literatuur — CAS 74-85-1MolGod_LITHUB_MAIN
⭐ Belangrijkste bevindingen (wetenschappelijke literatuur) 11 publicaties
🏆 CAS 74-85-1 — multi-criteria ranking (W12): 30% citaties · 20% recentheid · 20% onderwerp · 15% historisch · 15% open access.
  1. #1
    Marcin Krynski (2026) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
    Waarom het belangrijk is: Recent (2026) · open access
    SCORE 6.25 Mechanisme Open Access DOI ↗
  2. #2
    Zhang X, Tao J, Huang Y et al. (2026) · Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao
    Waarom het belangrijk is: Recent (2026) · overzichtsartikel · open access
    SCORE 6.25 Overzicht Open Access DOI ↗ PubMed ↗
  3. #3
    Zhang J, Liu Z, Farrar EJ et al. (2026) · Nature
    Waarom het belangrijk is: Recent (2026) · open access
    SCORE 6.25 Mechanisme Open Access DOI ↗ PubMed ↗
  4. #4
    Chatterjee S, Rankin JA, Farrugia MA et al. (2025) · Biochemistry
    Waarom het belangrijk is: Recent (2025) · open access
    SCORE 6.25 Mechanisme Open Access DOI ↗ PubMed ↗
  5. #5
    Wang R, Bowerman AF, Chen Y et al. (2025) · Journal of experimental botany
    Waarom het belangrijk is: Recent (2025) · open access
    SCORE 6.25 Mechanisme Open Access DOI ↗ PubMed ↗
  6. #6
    Zhao ZA, Li YR, Lei T et al. (2025) · Scientific reports
    Waarom het belangrijk is: Recent (2025) · open access
    SCORE 6.25 Mechanisme Open Access DOI ↗ PubMed ↗
  7. #7
    He K, Xu L, He Q et al. (2024) · Journal of integrative plant biology
    Waarom het belangrijk is: Recent (2024) · open access
    SCORE 6.25 Mechanisme Open Access DOI ↗ PubMed ↗
  8. #8
    Irfan M, Kumar P, Datta A (2025) · Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
    Waarom het belangrijk is: Recent (2025)
    SCORE 4.8 Industrie DOI ↗ PubMed ↗
  9. #9
    Dong Y, Ma H, Shen Y et al. (2025) · The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology
    Waarom het belangrijk is: Recent (2025)
    SCORE 4 Mechanisme DOI ↗ PubMed ↗
  10. #10
    Guo Y, Gong J, Hu R et al. (2025) · The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology
    Waarom het belangrijk is: Recent (2025)
    SCORE 4 Mechanisme DOI ↗ PubMed ↗
  11. #11
    Shukla D (2025) · Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
    Waarom het belangrijk is: Recent (2025)
    SCORE 4 Mechanisme DOI ↗ PubMed ↗

Description

Etylen, CAS 74-85-1

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “etheen”
📈 HPLC-gradiënt — optimalisator (LSS) SJABLOON

Gradiënt gebaseerd op PubChem XLogP3 + LSS (Snyder et al. 2010, hfdst. 9).

  • Kolom: C18
  • Buffer: phosphate
  • Debiet: 1 mL/min
  • logP: 1.2 (PubChem XLogP3)
  • Ramp: 15% → 95% B, 15 min
  • Totale analysetijd: 28 min
t (min) %A %B flow (mL/min) Opmerking
0 85 15 1 start (evenwicht)
2 85 15 1 einde van de initiële hold
17 5 95 1 einde van de LSS-ramp
22 5 95 1 kolomspoeling
23 85 15 1 terug naar init
28 85 15 1 her-equilibratie
📚 Wetenschappelijke referenties (Chicago Author-Date)
  1. Snyder, Lloyd R., John W. Dolan, and Joseph J. Kirkland. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. Wiley. — Chapter 9 — gradient elution, LSS theory (cited as Snyder et al. 2010 in tool description).
  2. Schoenmakers, Peter J. 1986. Optimization of Chromatographic Selectivity: A Guide to Method Development. Elsevier. — Numerical optimization of gradient programs.
  3. Snyder, L. R., and J. W. Dolan. 2007. High-Performance Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model. Wiley. — Foundational LSS reference for the %B_init = 5 + 8·logP heuristic implemented here.
  4. Nikitas, Pavlos, and Adrian Pappa-Louisi. 2009. "Retention models for isocratic and gradient elution in reversed-phase liquid chromatography." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1737-1755. [DOI ↗] — Modern review of gradient retention models — basis for non-LSS extensions.
  5. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772. [DOI ↗]
  6. Dong, Michael W. 2019. HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793. — Modern UHPLC gradient programming, sub-2 µm scaling rules.
  7. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182. [DOI ↗]
  8. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531. [DOI ↗] — Reference for orthogonal gradient design (2D-LC second dimension).
  9. Dolan, John W.. 2013. "When to Modify Method Conditions." LCGC North America 31: 192-199.
  10. Meyer, Veronika R. 2010. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Wiley. — Chapter 7 — practical gradient design with isokratyczny scouting.
  11. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531. [DOI ↗]
  12. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772. [DOI ↗]
  13. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182. [DOI ↗]
  14. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. 100 Years of Chromatography. Wiley-VCH.
  15. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531. [DOI ↗]

REST: /wp-json/molgod/v1/hplc/gradient/74-85-1

📐 HPLC-pieksymmetriecalculator (USP Tf / As)

Bereken de USP-tailingfactor (Tf) en de asymmetrie (As) uit de piekhalfbreedtes. Voer a (linker halfbreedte) en b (rechter halfbreedte) in, gemeten op 5% of 10% van de piekhoogte.

📚 Referenties (Chicago Author-Date)
  1. USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography." United States Pharmacopeial Convention. [link ↗] — Defines USP Tailing Factor T = (a+b)/(2a) measured at 5% peak height.
  2. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2023. "Validation of Analytical Procedures Q2(R2)." ICH Expert Working Group. [link ↗] — Tailing factor is a system suitability parameter (Section 6).
  3. Foley, Joe P., and John G. Dorsey. 1983. "Equations for calculation of chromatographic figures of merit for ideal and skewed peaks." Analytical Chemistry 55: 730-737 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00255a033 [link ↗] — Original asymmetry factor As = b/a at 10% height (Foley & Dorsey 1983).
  4. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 [link ↗] — Chapter 2.4 — peak shape diagnostics and remedies.
  5. Dolan, John W.. 2003. "Peak tailing and resolution." LCGC North America 21: 610-614 [link ↗] — How tailing factor degrades effective resolution.
  6. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z [link ↗] — Modern numerical deconvolution for asymmetric peaks.
  7. Kromidas, Stavros. 2017. "HPLC Made to Measure: A Practical Handbook for Optimization." Wiley-VCH. — Practical Tf and As thresholds for routine QC.
  8. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. "HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists." Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793 [link ↗]
  9. Meyer, Veronika R.. 2010. "Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography." Wiley.
  10. Heyden, Yvan Vander, et al.. 2009. "Robustness of pharmaceutical liquid chromatographic methods." Journal of Chromatography B 877: 2120-2129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.10.052 [link ↗]
  11. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03506 [link ↗]
  12. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗]
  13. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182 https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026 [link ↗]
  14. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. "100 Years of Chromatography." Wiley-VCH.
  15. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z [link ↗]
📊 Calculator voor resolutie en schotelgetal (Rs, N, H)

Bereken de resolutie Rs, het aantal theoretische schotels N en de HETP (H) voor een paar HPLC-pieken. Voer de retentietijden, piekbreedtes (op 50% of aan de basis) en de kolomlengte in.

📚 Referenties (Chicago Author-Date)
  1. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-16754-0. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 [link ↗] — Chapter 2 covers resolution, plate count and HETP fundamentals (Snyder et al. 2010).
  2. USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography." USP-NF 2024 ed. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. [link ↗] — Defines Rs >= 1.5 acceptance criterion and N calculation methods.
  3. Dolan, John W.. 2003. "How much resolution is enough?." LCGC North America 21: 350-353 [link ↗] — Practical guidance on Rs targets for routine method development.
  4. Van Deemter, J. J., F. J. Zuiderweg, and A. Klinkenberg. 1956. "Longitudinal diffusion and resistance to mass transfer as causes of nonideality in chromatography." Chemical Engineering Science 5: 271-289 https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(56)80003-1 [link ↗] — Origin of N = 5.54·(tr/w0.5)² half-height plate count formulation.
  5. Giddings, J. Calvin. 1965. "Dynamics of Chromatography, Part I: Principles and Theory." Marcel Dekker. ISBN 978-0-8247-1357-7. — Resolution equation Rs = (1/4)·√N·(α-1)/α·k/(1+k) (master equation).
  6. Foley, Joe P., and John G. Dorsey. 1983. "Equations for calculation of chromatographic figures of merit for ideal and skewed peaks." Analytical Chemistry 55: 730-737 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00255a033 [link ↗] — Skewed-peak corrections to apparent N.
  7. Knox, John H.. 1977. "Practical aspects of LC theory." Journal of Chromatographic Science 15: 352-364 https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/15.9.352 [link ↗]
  8. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗]
  9. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. "HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists." 2nd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-119-31378-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793 [link ↗]
  10. Meyer, Veronika R.. 2010. "Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography." 5th ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-68218-0.
  11. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03506 [link ↗]
  12. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗]
  13. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182 https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026 [link ↗]
  14. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. "100 Years of Chromatography." 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-33473-5.
  15. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z [link ↗]

Related products

🧪 System Suitability — live calculator (USP <621>)

Voer gegevens van 5-6 injecties in (areas, tr, tailing, plates) — de calculator berekent %RSD, gemiddelden en controleert de conformiteit met USP <621>. Je kunt CSV plakken (door komma's gescheiden) of afzonderlijke waarden bewerken.

📚 Referenties (Chicago Author-Date)
  1. USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography (System Suitability section)." USP-NF 2024 ed. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. [link ↗] — Defines RSD area < 2%, tailing < 2.0, N > 2000 acceptance criteria.
  2. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2023. "Validation of Analytical Procedures Q2(R2)." ICH Expert Working Group. [link ↗] — Section 5.4 — system suitability is part of method validation.
  3. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2018. "Reviewer Guidance: Validation of Chromatographic Methods." US Food and Drug Administration. [link ↗] — CDER reviewer perspective on chromatographic validation expectations.
  4. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." 3rd ed. Wiley. — Chapter 2 — system suitability fundamentals (RSD, Tf, N).
  5. Heyden, Yvan Vander, et al.. 2009. "Robustness of pharmaceutical liquid chromatographic methods." — Robustness vs. system suitability — design-of-experiments framework.
  6. Rozet, Eric, et al.. 2013. "Analysis of recent pharmaceutical regulatory documents on analytical method validation."
  7. European Medicines Agency (EMA). 2011. "Guideline on bioanalytical method validation EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009." EMA. [link ↗] — EMA companion guideline with bioanalytical SS criteria.
  8. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. "HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists." 2nd ed. Wiley. — UHPLC-specific suitability adjustments (n=5 vs. n=6).
  9. Kazakevich, Yuri V., and Rosario LoBrutto, eds.. 2007. "HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists." Wiley-Interscience.
  10. AOAC International. 2016. "Appendix F: Guidelines for Standard Method Performance Requirements." AOAC INTERNATIONAL. [link ↗] — Alternative SS thresholds for food/dietary samples.
  11. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial."
  12. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC."
  13. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations."
  14. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. "100 Years of Chromatography." 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH.
  15. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography."

Inne produkty z tej kategorii

📤 Voeg dit molecuul in op uw site

Heeft u een blog, forum of wetenschappelijke dienst? Voeg het interactieve 3D-molecuul in op uw website — elke lezer ziet het,met daaronder een link naar onze winkel waar hij het reagens kan kopen.

🔗 HTML-iframe-code (het eenvoudigst — werkt overal)

Kopieer en plak in de HTML-editor van uw site:

Pas width en height aan je lay-out aan.

⚙ WordPress Shortcode (voor andere winkels met MOL-GOD)

🌐 Directe link (voor e-mails, chats, LinkedIn, Twitter)

LinkedIn Twitter/X Facebook
QR code CAS 74-85-1

📱 QR code (voor het afdrukken op flyers / etiketten / catalogi)

Plaats het in een productcatalogus, op een fleslabel of een flyer. De klant scant het — ziet het 3D-molecuul op zijn telefoon, met een link naar uw winkel.

⬇ PNG downloaden

🖼 Open Graph image (voor social-media-metatags)

Wanneer u de link deelt, haalt Facebook/LinkedIn/Discord automatisch het afbeeldingsvoorbeeld op:

Preview
📋 Licentie: De embed behoudt een backlink naar DH Scientific (vereist — de winkel is de gegevensbron). Chemische gegevens zijn afkomstig van PubChem (CC0 — publiek domein). De embed is GRATIS voor educatief, commercieel en hobbygebruik.
📚 REFERENTIES (Verzamelde bibliografie, Chicago Author-Date) 107 items

Alle wetenschappelijke bronnen die in de accordeons hierboven voor CAS 74-85-1 worden geciteerd.Formaat: Chicago Manual of Style 17e ed., Author-Date-systeem.

🗄️ Wetenschappelijke databanken

  1. NIST. 2026. NIST Chemistry WebBook: CAS 74-85-1. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=74-85-1. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  2. AIST. 2026. Spectral Database for Organic Compounds (SDBS): CAS 74-85-1. Tsukuba, Japan: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology. https://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp/. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  3. PubChem. 2026. PubChem Compound Summary: CAS 74-85-1. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=74-85-1. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  4. ECHA. 2026. C&L Inventory and REACH Registration: CAS 74-85-1. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/annex-vi-to-clp. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)

📐 Standaarden / Richtlijnen

  1. ICH. 2026. "ICH Harmonised Guideline: CAS 74-85-1." Geneva: International Council for Harmonisation. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q1A%28R2%29%20Guideline.pdf. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  2. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 2024. "NFPA 30: Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code." NFPA, Quincy, MA. https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/all-codes-and-standards/list-of-codes-and-standards/detail?code=30.
  3. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2023. "29 CFR 1910.106 — Flammable Liquids." U.S. Department of Labor, Federal Register. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.106.
  4. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). 2024. "Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) — Harmonised Classification and Labelling." ECHA, Helsinki / Official Journal of the European Union. https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/clp/clp-classification.
  5. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016. "EN 374-1:2016 — Protective gloves against dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms — Part 1: Terminology and performance requirements for chemical risks." CEN, Brussels. https://standards.cencenelec.eu/dyn/www/f?p=205:110:::::FSP_PROJECT,FSP_ORG_ID:38536,6080&cs=1B0DAA8B85DF42E4A2C70E5D71F0BFA32.
  6. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2001. "EN 166:2001 — Personal eye-protection — Specifications." CEN, Brussels. https://standards.cencenelec.eu/dyn/www/f?p=CEN:110:0::::FSP_PROJECT:6541&cs=1F1A4E0A78C4DB6A28DBE2E8C29D89DCF.
  7. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2009. "EN 14605:2005+A1:2009 — Protective clothing against liquid chemicals — Performance requirements for clothing with liquid-tight (Type 3) or spray-tight (Type 4) connections." CEN, Brussels. https://standards.cencenelec.eu/dyn/www/f?p=CEN:110:0::::FSP_PROJECT:21581&cs=1A04A2D3C7CC58E9E6CB58D55F7EBFB7E.
  8. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2017. "Recommendations for Chemical Protective Clothing: A Companion to the NIOSH Pocket Guide." U.S. Department of Health & Human Services / CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ncpc/default.html.
  9. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2011. "Personal Protective Equipment — General requirements." U.S. Department of Labor — 29 CFR 1910.132. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.132.

📖 Boeken

  1. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook, 2nd ed.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://www.routledge.com/Hansen-Solubility-Parameters-A-Users-Handbook/Hansen/p/book/9780849372483.
  2. Barton, Allan F. M. 1991. CRC Handbook of Solubility Parameters and Other Cohesion Parameters: 2nd ed.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://www.routledge.com/CRC-Handbook-of-Solubility-Parameters-and-Other-Cohesion-Parameters/Barton/p/book/9780849301766.
  3. Connors, Kenneth A., Gordon L. Amidon, and Valentino J. Stella. 1986. Chemical Stability of Pharmaceuticals: A Handbook for Pharmacists, 2nd ed.. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471734683.
  4. Rumble, John R., ed. 2019. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics: 100th Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://hbcp.chemnetbase.com/.
  5. Urben, Peter G. 2017. Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 8th Edition. Academic Press / Elsevier, Oxford. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780081010594.

📘 Monografieën

  1. IARC. 2026. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans: CAS 74-85-1. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. https://monographs.iarc.who.int/list-of-classifications/. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)

📄 Wetenschappelijke artikelen (peer-reviewed)

  1. Stefanis, Emmanuel, and Costas Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." International Journal of Thermophysics 29: 568-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0415-z.
  2. Stoll, Vincent S., and John S. Blanchard. 1990. "Buffers: Principles and Practice: In Methods in Enzymology, vol. 182." San Diego: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(90)82008-P.

🌐 Websites

  1. ECHA. 2023. "Guidance on the Application of the CLP Criteria." European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/guidance-documents/guidance-on-clp.
  2. European Parliament. 2006. "Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH)." Official Journal of the European Union L 396: 1–849.
  3. ECHA. 2023. "Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern for Authorisation." European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/candidate-list-table.
  4. European Parliament. 2008. "Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP)." Official Journal of the European Union L 353: 1–1355.
  5. ECHA. 2017. "Guidance on the Compilation of Safety Data Sheets." Version 3.1. European Chemicals Agency. ECHA-17-G-01-EN. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/23047722/sds_en.pdf.
  6. ECHA. 2022. "Restrictions Under REACH — Annex XVII." European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/substances-restricted-under-reach.
  7. United Nations. 2021. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). 9th revised ed. ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.9. New York and Geneva: United Nations. https://unece.org/ghs-rev9-2021.
  8. ECHA. 2020. "Understanding REACH." European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/reach/understanding-reach.
  9. U.S. OSHA. 2026. "Occupational Safety and Health Guidance: CAS 74-85-1." Washington, DC: U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. https://www.osha.gov/hazwoper. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  10. National Fire Protection Association (2018) — NFPA 472: Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/nfpa-472.
  11. European Union. 2026. "EUR-Lex Legal Database: CAS 74-85-1." Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32012L0018. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  12. U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2024) — NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/.
  13. Snyder, Lloyd R., John W. Dolan, and Joseph J. Kirkland. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. Wiley.
  14. Schoenmakers, Peter J.. 1986. Optimization of Chromatographic Selectivity: A Guide to Method Development. Elsevier.
  15. Snyder, L. R., and J. W. Dolan. 2007. High-Performance Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model. Wiley.
  16. Nikitas, Pavlos, and Adrian Pappa-Louisi. 2009. "Retention models for isocratic and gradient elution in reversed-phase liquid chromatography." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1737-1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.10.005.
  17. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094.
  18. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793.
  19. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026.
  20. Dolan, John W.. 2013. "When to Modify Method Conditions." LCGC North America 31: 192-199. https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/when-modify-method-conditions.
  21. Meyer, Veronika R.. 2010. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Wiley.
  22. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. 100 Years of Chromatography. Wiley-VCH.
  23. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z.
  24. Van Deemter, J. J., F. J. Zuiderweg, and A. Klinkenberg. 1956. "Longitudinal diffusion and resistance to mass transfer as causes of nonideality in chromatography." https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(56)80003-1.
  25. Giddings, J. Calvin. 1965. "Dynamics of Chromatography, Part I: Principles and Theory." Marcel Dekker.
  26. Poppe, Hans. 1997. "Some reflections on speed and efficiency of modern chromatographic methods." https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00376-2.
  27. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026.
  28. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094.
  29. Knox, John H.. 1977. "Practical aspects of LC theory." https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/15.9.352.
  30. Snyder, L. R., J. J. Kirkland, and J. L. Glajch. 1997. "Practical HPLC Method Development." Wiley.
  31. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z.
  32. Sadek, Paul C.. 2002. "The HPLC Solvent Guide." Wiley-Interscience.
  33. Snyder, L. R.. 1978. "Classification of the solvent properties of common liquids." https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/16.6.223.
  34. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2010. "Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry." Wiley-VCH.
  35. Vailaya, Anant, and Csaba Horváth. 1998. "Retention thermodynamics in hydrophobic interaction chromatography." https://doi.org/10.1021/ie980212h.
  36. Krstulović, Andrea M., and Phyllis R. Brown. 1981. "Reversed-phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography." Wiley.
  37. Boysen, Reinhard I., and Milton T. W. Hearn. 2009. "Multi-modal HPLC of proteins." https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/47.8.645.
  38. USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography." United States Pharmacopeial Convention. https://www.usp.org/harmonization-standards/pdg/general-chapters/chromatography.
  39. Foley, Joe P., and John G. Dorsey. 1983. "Equations for calculation of chromatographic figures of merit for ideal and skewed peaks." https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00255a033.
  40. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183.
  41. Dolan, John W.. 2003. "Peak tailing and resolution." https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/peak-tailing-and-resolution.
  42. Kromidas, Stavros. 2017. "HPLC Made to Measure: A Practical Handbook for Optimization." Wiley-VCH.
  43. Heyden, Yvan Vander, et al.. 2009. "Robustness of pharmaceutical liquid chromatographic methods." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.10.052.
  44. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2024. "USP <621> Chromatography." In United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary, USP 47-NF 42. Rockville, MD: USP. https://www.uspnf.com/.
  45. European Pharmacopoeia Commission. 2024. "2.2.46 Chromatographic Separation Techniques." In European Pharmacopoeia, 11th ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe — EDQM. https://www.edqm.eu/en/european-pharmacopoeia-ph-eur-11th-edition.
  46. International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
  47. Kolthoff, Izaak Maurits, and Philip J. Elving, eds. 1978. Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Part I: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
  48. Skoog, Douglas A., F. James Holler, and Stanley R. Crouch. 2018. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 7th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
  49. Christian, Gary D., Purnendu K. Dasgupta, and Kevin A. Schug. 2014. Analytical Chemistry. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  50. EURACHEM/CITAC. 2012. "Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement." 3rd ed. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4. https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/QUAM2012_P1.pdf.
  51. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183.
  52. Dolan, John W.. 2003. "How much resolution is enough?." https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/how-much-resolution-enough.
  53. USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography (System Suitability section)." United States Pharmacopeial Convention. https://www.usp.org/harmonization-standards/pdg/general-chapters/chromatography.
  54. U.S. FDA. 2026. "FDA Guidance and Resources: CAS 74-85-1." Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/media/74954/download. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  55. Rozet, Eric, et al.. 2013. "Analysis of recent pharmaceutical regulatory documents on analytical method validation." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.111.
  56. European Medicines Agency (EMA). 2011. "Guideline on bioanalytical method validation EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009." EMA. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-bioanalytical-method-validation_en.pdf.
  57. Kazakevich, Yuri V., and Rosario LoBrutto, eds.. 2007. "HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists." Wiley-Interscience. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470087954.
  58. AOAC International. 2016. "Appendix F: Guidelines for Standard Method Performance Requirements." AOAC INTERNATIONAL. https://www.aoac.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/app_f.pdf.
  59. International Organization for Standardization. 1994. "ISO 5725-2:1994 Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results — Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/11834.html.
  60. Grubbs, Frank E. 1950. "Sample Criteria for Testing Outlying Observations." Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (1): 27–58.
  61. Dixon, Wilfrid J. 1950. "Analysis of Extreme Values." Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (4): 488–506.
  62. Snedecor, George W., and William G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
  63. Student [William Sealy Gosset]. 1908. "The Probable Error of a Mean." Biometrika 6 (1): 1–25.
  64. International Organization for Standardization. 2005. "ISO 3534-1:2006 Statistics — Vocabulary and Symbols — Part 1: General Statistical Terms and Terms Used in Probability." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/40145.html.
  65. Thompson, Michael, Stephen L. R. Ellison, and Roger Wood. 2002. "Harmonized Guidelines for Single-Laboratory Validation of Methods of Analysis." Pure and Applied Chemistry 74 (5): 835–855.
  66. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2024. European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), Applicable as from 1 January 2025 (ECE/TRANS/352). Geneva: UNECE. https://unece.org/transport/dangerous-goods/adr-2025-edition.
  67. International Air Transport Association. 2026. Dangerous Goods Regulations (DGR). 67th ed. Montreal: IATA. https://www.iata.org/en/programs/cargo/dgr/.
  68. International Maritime Organization. 2024. International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code, 2024 Edition (Amendment 42-24). London: IMO. https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/DangerousGoods-default.aspx.
  69. United Nations. 2025. Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods: Model Regulations (Orange Book). 24th revised ed. ST/SG/AC.10/1/Rev.24. New York and Geneva: United Nations. https://unece.org/transport/dangerous-goods/un-model-regulations.
  70. International Civil Aviation Organization. 2025. Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air (Doc 9284). 2025–2026 ed. Montreal: ICAO. https://www.icao.int/safety/DangerousGoods/Pages/technical-instructions.aspx.
  71. United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Convention. 2024. "USP General Chapter <621> Chromatography." USP. https://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp/document/harmonization/gen-chapter/g05_pf_30_4_2004.pdf.
  72. European Medicines Agency (EMA). 2011. "Guideline on bioanalytical method validation EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009." EMA Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-bioanalytical-method-validation_en.pdf.
  73. Sejm RP. 2026. "Internetowy System Aktow Prawnych (ISAP): CAS 74-85-1." Warszawa: Kancelaria Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20200000010. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  74. Ministerstwo Klimatu i Srodowiska. 2026. "Baza Danych o Odpadach (BDO): CAS 74-85-1." Warszawa: Ministerstwo Klimatu i Srodowiska. https://bdo.mos.gov.pl/. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  75. Pohanish, Richard P.. 2017. "Sittig's Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens." Elsevier.
  76. Lewis, Richard J.. 2012. "Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials." Wiley.
  77. NIOSH. 2024. "Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/.
  78. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2023. "European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR 2025)." UNECE. https://unece.org/transport/standards/transport/dangerous-goods/adr-2025.
  79. IPCS INCHEM. 2024. "International Programme on Chemical Safety — Waste Management Guidelines." WHO/UNEP/ILO. https://www.inchem.org/.
  80. International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories." ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
  81. World Health Organization. 2010. "WHO Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceutical Products: Main Principles (WHO Technical Report Series No. 957, Annex 3)." WHO Press. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/trs957-annex3.
  82. European Medicines Agency. 2014. "Guideline on Process Validation for Finished Products — Information and Data to Be Provided EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/BWP/70278/2012." European Medicines Agency. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-process-validation-finished-products-information-data-be-provided-regulatory-submissions-revision-1_en.pdf.
  83. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2024. "United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary, USP 47-NF 42." USP. https://www.uspnf.com/.
  84. European Pharmacopoeia Commission. 2024. "European Pharmacopoeia 11th Edition." Council of Europe — EDQM. https://www.edqm.eu/en/european-pharmacopoeia-ph-eur-11th-edition.
  85. Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S). 2021. "Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products PE 009-15." PIC/S Secretariat, Geneva. https://picscheme.org/en/publications.
  86. International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council (IPEC) and Pharmaceutical Quality Group (PQG). 2017. "Joint IPEC-PQG Good Manufacturing Practices Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients." IPEC-Americas. https://ipecamericas.org/sites/default/files/IPECPQGGMPGuide2017.pdf.
📥 BibTeX downloaden📥 RIS downloadenImporteren in Zotero/Mendeley/EndNote/Papers.