acetone — label CAS 67-64-1

acetone

0,99 €

Chemical reagent Aceton czysty rozpuszczalnik (CAS 67-64-1). Full encyclopedic card — classification, properties and safety data — below.

🔒 Demo mode — this item is not for sale.

Legal substance. dhscientific.com is a demonstration of the MOL-GOD platform — we sell nothing and no orders are fulfilled. Banned substances are blocked here automatically from the regulatory canon (compare e.g. Heptachlor).

Audit of your SDS — free → · Contact

MolGod_SDSCARD_1
REACH 2020/878
v2 · 31.07.2026
Category:
🧬 3D Molecule Visualizer
Loading molecule...
3D model Aceton, CAS 67-64-1, molecular formula C₃H₆O, molar mass 58.08 g/mol
Chemical Overview: AcetonMolGod_OVERVIEW_1
Molecular formulaC₃H₆O
Molecular weight58.08 g/mol
Melting point-94.7 °C
Boiling point56.05 °C
Density0.7845 g/cm³
LogP (lipophilicity)-0.24
pKa19.3
SMILESCC(C)=O

Synonyms: Propan-2-one · Dimethyl ketone

Data sources: PubChem (NLM/NIH), CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Last updated: 2026-11-10

🎓 Badania akademickie: Aceton

#1🎓College of Electronic Science and Engineering📅 2026
Optimizing the Stability of Co(3)O(4) for Acetone Sensing by Oxygen Vacancy Alteration
Zhi S; Zhao L; Xing Y; Zhang H; Yu C; Fei T.
Full LAB report →
#2🎓School of Environment and Energy📅 2026
Upcycling Waste Etchant into a Doped-Cu(2)O Electrocatalyst for Efficient Acetoxime Synthesis from Nitrate and Acetone
Zhong W; He S; Chen P; Xiang X; Liu X; Zhang C.
Full LAB report →
#3🎓College of Chemistry📅 2026
S,N-Codoped Carbon Dots Derived From Acetone and Thiourea via Solvothermal Method: A Fluorescent Probe for Ag(+) Ion Detection
Lai Y; Liu S; Yu H; Song T; Guo J; Liu Y.
Full LAB report →
#4🎓School of Mechanical Science and Engineering📅 2025
Facile Fabrication of Room-Temperature Parts-per-Billion-Level Acetone Sensor Driven by In Situ Laser-Induced Oxygen-Vacancy-Rich Cu/Cu(2)O/CuO Composites
Hu Y; Xie W; Wang Z; Ma J; Hou L; Wang Q.
Full LAB report →
📊 Physicochemical properties

Quick Reference

Formula: C₃H₆O
MW: 58.08 g/mol
CAS: 67-64-1
Appearance: Colorless volatile liquid
Odour: Fruity odor
Odour: Fruity odor

Detailed Properties

Property Value Unit Conditions Source
Density (ρ) 0.7845 g/cm³ 20 °C (68 °F) CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Melting Point (mp) -94.70 °C (-138.5 °F) 1 atm CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Boiling Point (bp) 56.05 °C (132.9 °F) 1 atm CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Flash Point -20.00 °C (-4 °F) closed cup CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Vapor Pressure 230.000 mmHg 25 °C (77 °F) CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Water Solubility miscible g/L 20 °C (68 °F) CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Viscosity (η) 0.306 cP 25 °C (77 °F) CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Refractive Index (nD) 1.3588 20 °C (68 °F), D-line CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
pKa 19.300 25 °C (77 °F) CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
🔬 Advanced Properties
Surface Tension 23.500 mN/m 20°C
Dielectric Constant (ε) 20.700 25°C
Heat Capacity (Cp) 2.150 J/(g·K) 25°C

Chemical Identifiers

SMILES: CC(C)=O

Data sources: PubChem, NIST Chemistry WebBook, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (103rd ed.)

Last updated: 2026-06-14

Regulatory status of the substance
This substance is subject to regulatory requirements: hazardous waste management (BDO register); transport of dangerous goods (ADR/RID/IMDG); precursors / psychotropic substances (GIS register). Details in the \"Regulatory Status (REACH/ECHA/CLP)\" section and on the SDS. Regulatory information — does not restrict purchase in this store.
🧮 Stoichiometry CalculatorMolGod_STOICH_1
🔍 External identifiersMolGod_EXTID_1
13 of 16 ID systems81%
DatabaseIdentifierActions
CAS Registry Number67-64-1Open →
PubChem CID180Open →
InChIKeyCSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-NOpen →
InChIInChI=1S/C3H6O/c1-3(2)4/h1-2H3
SMILESCC(C)=O
EC Number200-662-2Open →
KEGG CompoundC00207Open →
HMDBHMDB0001659Open →
ChemSpider175Open →
MeSH UID (NLM)D000096Open →
UNII (FDA)1364PS73AFOpen →
NSC Number (NCI)135802Open →
WikiData QIDQ49546Open →

Sources: PubChem (NIH), Wikidata SPARQL, KEGG, ChEMBL (EBI), CompTox CTX (EPA).

📡 Spectroscopy — CAS 67-64-1MolGod_SPECHUB_MAIN
📊 Spectra (NMR, IR, MS, UV-Vis) (1)

Available spectrum types: IR

IR spectrum (KBr, 4000-400 cm⁻¹)

440 data points · Source: NIST WebBook · NIST ↗ · 📥 JCAMP-DX
📋 Peak assignment table
Type Position Intensity Assignment
IR 450 0 —
IR 458 0 —
IR 466 0 —
IR 474 0 —
IR 482 0 —
IR 490 0 —
IR 498 0.1 —
IR 506 0.1 —
IR 514 0.1 —
IR 522 0.1 —
IR 530 0.1 —
IR 538 0.1 —
IR 546 0.1 —
IR 554 0 —
IR 562 0 —
IR 570 0 —
IR 578 0 —
IR 586 0 —
IR 594 0 —
IR 602 0 —
🎓 Spectrum interpretation guide (for students)
How to read an IR spectrum
  • 3200-3600 cm⁻¹ — O-H stretch (broad peak = hydrogen bonding)
  • 2850-3000 cm⁻¹ — C-H stretch (sp³)
  • 1650-1750 cm⁻¹ — C=O stretch (ketones, aldehydes, esters)
  • 1400-1600 cm⁻¹ — aromatic ring vibrations
  • 1000-1300 cm⁻¹ — C-O stretch (ethers, alcohols)
  • No absorption = no functional group → compare with a reference

Sources: LibreTexts ↗, Silverstein (Spectrometric ID) ↗

📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date) (9 sources)

📚 The book bibliography is awaiting generation. Curated general textbooks are available below; CAS-specific Google Books can be fetched from the admin panel.

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2024. "NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69." Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
  2. Spectral Database for Organic Structure Determination (SDBS). 2024. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
  3. Ulrich, Eldon L., Hideo Akutsu, John F. Doreleijers, Yoko Harano, Yannis E. Ioannidis, Jundong Lin, Miron Livny, et al. 2008. "BioMagResBank." Nucleic Acids Research 36 (D1): D402–D408. [DOI ↗]
  4. Horai, Hisayuki, Masanori Arita, Shigehiko Kanaya, Yoshito Nihei, Tasuku Ikeda, Kazuhiro Suwa, Yuya Ojima, et al. 2010. "MassBank: A Public Repository for Sharing Mass Spectral Data for Life Sciences." Journal of Mass Spectrometry 45 (7): 703–714. [DOI ↗]
  5. Linstrom, P.J., and W.G. Mallard, eds. 2024. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. ↗
  6. McDonald, M. Shane, Mike McAvoy, and Ajit Bhalerao. 1988. "JCAMP-DX: A Standard Form for Exchange of Infrared Spectra in Computer Readable Form." Applied Spectroscopy 42 (1): 151–162. [DOI ↗]
  7. PubChem. 2024. "PubChem Compound Database." National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
📐 Physical & Chemical Properties (DB) 25 fields MolGod Score: Primary
Property Value Unit Conditions Source
Melting point -94.70 [1][6][11] °C 1 atm CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Boiling point 56.05 [1][6][11] °C 760 mmHg CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Water solubility miscible [1] g/L 20°C CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Density (ρ) 0.7845 [1] g/cm³ 20°C CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Refractive index (n_D) 1.3588 [1] — 20°C, sodium D CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Viscosity (η) 0.306 [1] cP 25°C CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Vapor pressure 230.000 [1] mmHg 25°C CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Flash point -20.00 [1] °C closed cup CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Autoignition temperature 465.00 [1] °C in air CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
UV λmax 270 [1][2] nm water/MeOH CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
UV εmax 16 [1][2] M⁻¹·cm⁻¹ at λmax CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
pKa₁ 19.300 [1][2][10] — 25°C CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
logP (octanol/water) -0.240 [1][8][9] — 25°C CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
logD (pH 7) -0.240 [1][8][9] — pH 7.4 CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Dielectric constant (ε) 20.700 [1] — 25°C CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Surface tension 23.500 [1] mN/m 20°C CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Specific heat (cp) 2.150 [1] J/(g·K) 25°C CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Thermal conductivity (k) 0.1610 [1] W/(m·K) 25°C CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Dipole moment (μ) 2.880 [1] D gas phase CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
ΔH vaporization 31.300 [1][4] kJ/mol NBP CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
ΔH fusion 5.720 [1] kJ/mol at mp CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Critical temperature (Tc) 235.00 [1][4] °C critical point CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Critical pressure (Pc) 47.000 [1][4] bar critical point CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Acentric factor (ω) 0.3070 [1][4] — Pitzer CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
Ethanol solubility miscible [1] g/L 25°C CRC Handbook 105th ed. (Haynes 2024)
📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date) (12 sources)
  1. Haynes, William M., ed. 2024. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 105th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-032-55554-4. ↗
  2. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2024. "NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69." Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
  3. Yaws, Carl L. 2014. The Yaws Handbook of Physical Properties for Hydrocarbons and Chemicals. 2nd ed. Oxford: Gulf Professional Publishing.
  4. PubChem. 2024. "PubChem Compound Database." National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
  5. Marrero, J., and R. Gani. 2001. "Group-Contribution Based Estimation of Pure Component Properties." Fluid Phase Equilibria 183–184: 183–208. ↗
  6. Joback, K. G., and R. C. Reid. 1987. "Estimation of Pure-Component Properties from Group-Contributions." Chemical Engineering Communications 57 (1–6): 233–243. ↗
  7. Sangster, J. 1997. Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients: Fundamentals and Physical Chemistry. Chichester: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-97397-3.
  8. Mannhold, Raimund, and Han van de Waterbeemd. 2001. "Substructure and Whole Molecule Approaches for Calculating Log P." Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 15 (4): 337–354. ↗
  9. Perrin, Ditlev D., Boyd Dempsey, and E. P. Serjeant. 1981. pKa Prediction for Organic Acids and Bases. London: Chapman and Hall. ISBN 0-412-21090-5.
  10. Constantinou, Leonidas, and Rafiqul Gani. 1994. "New Group Contribution Method for Estimating Properties of Pure Compounds." AIChE Journal 40 (10): 1697–1710. ↗
  11. Ertl, Peter, Bernhard Rohde, and Paul Selzer. 2000. "Fast Calculation of Molecular Polar Surface Area as a Sum of Fragment-Based Contributions and Its Application to the Prediction of Drug Transport Properties." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 43 (20): 3714–3717. ↗
🔄 Concentration unit converter LIVE MolGod_UNITCONV_1

Enter the Aceton concentration in any unit — the rest will be calculated automatically.

MW: 58.08 g/mol · IUPAC Gold Book ↗

⚗️ Conversion formulas + citations (per formula)
ConversionFormulaAccuracySource
% (w/v) ↔ molarityc (mol/L) = (% × 10) / MW±0.5% rel. when density ≈ 1.0 g/mLIUPAC (2019)
millimolar ↔ molarc (mol/L) = mM × 10⁻³ExactCohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
molarity (mol/L)c = n/V = (m/MW)/V±0.1% (depends on MW precision)IUPAC (2019)
parts per million (mg/L) ↔ molarityc (mol/L) = ppm / (1000 × MW); equivalently ppm = mg/L for dilute aqueous±1% (density-independent for dilute solutions)IUPAC (2019)
mg/mL ↔ molarityc (mol/L) = (mg/mL × 1000) / MW / 1000 = mg/mL / MW × 1±0.2%Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
g/L ↔ molarityc (mol/L) = (g/L) / MW±0.1% (depends on MW precision)Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
mmol/L ↔ molarityc (mol/L) = mmol/L × 10⁻³ExactCohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
Celsius ↔ KelvinT(K) = t(°C) + 273.15±0.01 K (ITS-90 scale)BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) (2019)
Celsius ↔ FahrenheitT(°F) = T(°C) × 9/5 + 32±0.1 °FThompson A, Taylor BN (2008)
density-corrected % ↔ molarityc (mol/L) = (%w/w × ρ × 10) / MW, ρ in g/mL±0.1% when ρ known to 3 decimalsCohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
📚 Bibliography (8 authoritative sources)
  1. Thompson A, Taylor BN (2008). Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI). NIST Special Publication 811 · DOI: 10.6028/NIST.SP.811-2008
    → Primary SI standard for US scientific usage
  2. Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry — The IUPAC Green Book. RSC Publishing, 3rd ed. · DOI: 10.1039/9781847557889 · ISBN: 978-0-85404-433-7
    → Canonical IUPAC guide for chemistry quantities/units
  3. BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) (2019). The International System of Units (SI), 9th edition. BIPM · ↗
    → International SI definitions (incl. redefined kilogram 2019)
  4. ISO/IEC (2022). Quantities and units — Part 1: General. International Organization for Standardization — ISO 80000-1:2022 · ↗
    → General rules for physical quantities and units
  5. ISO/IEC (2019). Quantities and units — Part 9: Physical chemistry and molecular physics. International Organization for Standardization — ISO 80000-9:2019 · ↗
    → Concentration / molality / amount-of-substance conventions
  6. Tiesinga E, Mohr PJ, Newell DB, Taylor BN (2021). CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93(2):025010 · DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010
    → Avogadro, gas constant, molar volume (2019 SI revision)
  7. IUPAC (2019). Compendium of Chemical Terminology — the IUPAC Gold Book (online). IUPAC · DOI: 10.1351/goldbook
    → Definitions of mass fraction, molality, normality, ppm, activity
  8. Mills IM, Cvitaš T, Homann K, Kallay N, Kuchitsu K (1988). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry. Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1st ed. · ISBN: 0-632-01773-5
    → Historical predecessor of IUPAC Green Book
🧪 Solution Preparation Wizard WIZARD MolGod_PREP_1
① Select concentration
② Target volume
③ Solvent

Calculations per: IUPAC Gold Book ↗, Merck ↗

Solvent compatibilityMolGod_SOLV_1

Estimate based on water solubility and logP. Indicative data — does not replace experimental studies.

SolventCompatibilityNotesReferences
Water+ GoodlogP indicates hydrophilicity
EtOH+ GoodEtOH — universal polar solvent
Acetone~ ModeratePartially compatible
DCM- PoorPoor compatibility with polar solvents
DMSO+ GoodDMSO — strong aprotic solvent
THF~ ModerateTHF — limited for strongly polar compounds
Hexane- PoorPractically insoluble in hexane
CHCl3- PoorPoor compatibility with polar solvents

Data sources for logP/solubility: logP: -0.24

📚 Scientific references for solvents (Chicago Author-Date) — click to expand

Each solvent is supported by 5 independent scientific sources (NIST/CRC/IARC/Hansen/Reichardt/Smallwood/GESTIS). Full citations below.

Water · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. Rumble, John R., ed. 2023. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 104th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  2. International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam (IAPWS). 1997. "Release on the Static Dielectric Constant of Ordinary Water Substance." IAPWS R8-97. [link ↗]
  3. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220. [link ↗]
  4. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006834. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Water." GESTIS Substance Database. Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
EtOH · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. Rumble, John R., ed. 2023. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 104th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  2. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220. [link ↗]
  3. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183. [link ↗]
  4. Smallwood, Ian M. 1996. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties. London: Arnold. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-340-64578-9.X5000-9. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Ethanol." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
Acetone · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220. [link ↗]
  2. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  3. Rumble, John R., ed. 2023. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 104th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  4. Smallwood, Ian M. 1996. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties. London: Arnold. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Acetone." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
DCM · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Methane, dichloro- (CAS 75-09-2)." NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
  2. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1999. "Dichloromethane." IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans 71: 251–315. [link ↗]
  4. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Dichloromethane." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
DMSO · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. Wypych, George. 2019. Handbook of Solvents. Volume 1: Properties. 3rd ed. Toronto: ChemTec Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-02235-3. [link ↗]
  2. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. [link ↗]
  3. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  4. National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Methane, sulfinylbis- (CAS 67-68-5)." NIST Chemistry WebBook. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Dimethyl sulfoxide." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
THF · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. Armarego, Wilfred L. F., and Christina Li Lin Chai. 2009. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals. 6th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-567-8.50003-3. [link ↗]
  2. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  3. National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Furan, tetrahydro- (CAS 109-99-9)." NIST Chemistry WebBook. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
  4. Smallwood, Ian M. 1996. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties. London: Arnold. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Tetrahydrofuran." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
Hexane · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Hexane (CAS 110-54-3)." NIST Chemistry WebBook. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
  2. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  3. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. [link ↗]
  4. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1999. Toxicological Profile for n-Hexane. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "n-Hexane." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
CHCl3 · NIST CAS lookup ↗
  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1999. "Chloroform." IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans 73: 131–182. [link ↗]
  2. National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Methane, trichloro- (CAS 67-66-3)." NIST Chemistry WebBook. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
  3. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
  4. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. [link ↗]
  5. IFA. n.d. "Chloroform." GESTIS Substance Database. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
Solubility theory (applied in compatibility prediction):
  1. Yalkowsky, Samuel H., and Shri C. Valvani. 1980. "Solubility and Partitioning I: Solubility of Nonelectrolytes in Water." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 69 (8): 912–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600690814 — General Solubility Equation (GSE): logS = 0.5 − logP − 0.01(MP−25).
  2. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006834 — HSP triplet (dD, dP, dH) + Ra formula.
  3. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220 — E_T(30) polarity scale, solwatochromia.
  4. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 — Eluotropic series, polarity index.
  5. PubChem Compound Database — CAS 67-64-1 lookup ↗ — logP (XLogP3), water solubility experimental + predicted.

Full bibliography in the REFERENCES accordion (at the bottom of the page) — Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed., Author-Date.

🔬 Purity Check Guide Quality control

Verify reagent purity using standardized analytical methods. Select a test method below and enter your measurement results for automated calculation.

🛡️ Safety — CAS 67-64-1MolGod_SAFEHUB_MAIN
Data limitations notice. The safety information on this page is for reference only and does not replace a full safety data sheet (SDS). Before using the product, consult the manufacturer's current safety data sheet and the GHS/CLP guidance. The CLP classification applies to the pure bulk substance, not to commercial formulations.

GHS/CLP classification — Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 + UN GHS Rev. 9 (2021).

⚠️ Danger
GHS02 — Flammable
GHS02 Flammable
GHS07 — Irritant / harmful
GHS07 Irritant / harmful

🚨 Hazard statements (H)

  • H225 — Highly flammable liquid and vapour
  • H336 — May cause drowsiness or dizziness
  • H319 — Causes serious eye irritation
  • EUH066

🛡 Precautionary statements (P)

  • P210 — Keep away from heat, hot surfaces, sparks, open flames and other ignition sources. No smoking
  • P261 — Avoid breathing dust/fume/gas/mist/vapours/spray
  • P271 — Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area

✓ Harmonised classification pursuant to Annex VI of the CLP Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 (official, binding classification). Index number: 606-001-00-8.

Reference (Chicago): European Chemicals Agency. "acetone; propan-2-one; propanone, Index No. 606-001-00-8." In Table 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation), 23rd Adaptation to Technical Progress. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency, 2026. https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/annex-vi-to-clp.

Translations: CLP Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, Annexes III and IV. Data: PubChem/NLM.

📚 Consolidated scientific references — Chicago Author-Date 10 sources

References collected from all Safety Hub tabs. CAS: 67-64-1 · PubChem ↗

  1. Parlament Europejski i Rada UE. 2008. "Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 1272/2008 w sprawie klasyfikacji, oznakowania i pakowania substancji (CLP)." Dz.Urz. UE L 353. [↗] GHS, Regulations
  2. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2021. "Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), Ninth Revised Edition." United Nations, Geneva. [↗] GHS
  3. Goldfrank, Lewis R., Robert S. Hoffman, Mary Ann Howland, et al.. 2019. "Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 11th ed.." McGraw-Hill Education, New York. ISBN 978-1-25-985961-8. Pierwsza pomoc, Toksykologia
  4. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2023. "NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards (DHHS Publ. 2005-149)." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services / CDC, Cincinnati, OH. [↗] Pierwsza pomoc, PPE, Toksykologia
  5. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016. "EN 374-1:2016 — Protective gloves against dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms." CEN, Brussels. [↗] PPE
  6. UNECE. 2023. "European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR 2025)." United Nations, Geneva. [↗] Utylizacja, Regulacje
  7. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 2022. "NFPA 400 — Hazardous Materials Code." NFPA, Quincy, MA. [↗] Magazynowanie
  8. Urben, P.G. (ed.). 2017. "Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 8th ed.." Butterworth-Heinemann / Elsevier, Oxford. [↗] Magazynowanie
  9. Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska RP. 2023. "Baza danych o produktach i opakowaniach oraz o gospodarce odpadami (BDO)." Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska, Warszawa. [↗] Utylizacja
  10. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC / WHO). 2024. "IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans — List of Classifications." WHO, Lyon. [↗] Toksykologia

Tabs with their own references (Emergency, PPE, Storage, Waste) contain additional bibliographic entries within their respective sections.

📈 Analytical statistics (t-test · RSD · Grubbs · Q-Dixon) ICH Q2

Paste a series of replicate measurements (CSV, or one number per line). The calculator computes the mean, standard deviation and 95% CI, and detects outliers (Grubbs + Dixon Q).

Separator: comma, space, tab, new line. Minimum 3 measurements.
📐 Statistical formulas
  • x̄ = Σxᵢ / n — arithmetic mean
  • s² = Σ(xᵢ - x̄)² / (n-1) — sample variance
  • s = √s² — standard deviation
  • RSD% = (s / x̄) × 100% — relative standard deviation
  • CI₉₅ = x̄ ± t(0.05, n-1) × s / √n — Student's t
  • G = |xᵢ - x̄| / s — Grubbs' test
  • Q = |xsuspect - xnearest| / |xmax - xmin| — Dixon Q-test

Source: ICH Q2(R2) Validation of Analytical Procedures · ICH PDF ↗

🧪 Buffer Recipe Calculator UNIQUE
References: pKa values from Goldberg NIST 81 · CRC Handbook 100th ed. · Stoll & Blanchard 1990 (DOI)

Choose a buffer from the list of 20 popular systems → enter the target pH → get an exact recipe with the masses to weigh out.

Step 1: Choose a buffer system

📜 Recipe history (last 10)
🚚 Transport classification (ADR / IATA / IMDG) UN1090
UN Number
UN1090
ACETONE
Flammable

🛣️ ADR Road Transport

Class:
3
Packing Group:
II
Shipping name:
ACETONE
Tunnel Code:
(D/E)
Limited Quantity (L):
1

✈️ IATA Air Transport

Class:
3
Packing instructions:
353 / 364
Max quantity (PAX):
1 L
Max quantity (CAO):
60 L

🚢 IMDG Sea Transport

Class:
3
EmS Code:
F-E, S-D

Sources: ADR 2025 ↗ · IATA DGR ↗ · IMDG Code ↗

🔬 HPLC/GC methods (3 methods)
📄
White agrocybe cylindracea outperforms the brown strain in nutritional value, flavor profile, and anticancer activity
HPLCFood Chemistry: X202687% ✓OAResearch method (specificity, robustness)
Column: C18, 0.22 μm
Phase: mobile phase A, sodium acetate–triethylamine solution (pH 6
Detection: MS
Flow: 0.80 mL/min
Temp.: 22.0 °C
Inj.: 50 μL
Gu C, Lin Y, Hao M, Lin Z, Fang J, Luo J, et al. White agrocybe cylindracea outperforms the brown strain in nutritional value, flavor profile, and anticancer activity. Food Chemistry: X. 2026;39:104579. doi:10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104579
🔗 DOI🏠 PMC📚 PubMed📄 PDF
Agrocybe cylindracea, an edible and medicinal mushroom, comprises white (BC) and brown (CS) strains. The white strain is a new cultivar whose nutritional value remains unexplored. Nutritional components and bioactivities of BC and CS were compared using electronic nose, electronic tongue, texture analyzer, chromatography, taste re-addition experiments, and cytotoxicity assays. BC showed significantly higher crude polysaccharides, soluble protein, crude fiber, equivalent umami concentration, taste-active compounds (free amino acids and 5′-nucleotides), and stronger sourness, bitterness, sweetness, and umami than CS. Aspartic acid, glutamine, tryptophan, lysine, and 5′-cytidylic acid mainly contributed to sourness; glutamine and tryptophan to umami. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) identified 41 (BC) and 37 (CS) volatiles with distinct aroma profiles. Both strains inhibited HCT116 and HGC27 proliferation via elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS). This first systematic comparison demonstrates BC exceeds CS in nutritional value, flavor, and anticancer activity.
Nutritional componentsBiological activityQualityVolatile compounds
📄
Physiological and transcriptomic responses of Chlorella sorokiniana to ciprofloxacin reveal molecular mechanisms for antibiotic removal
HPLCiScience202290% ✓OAResearch method (specificity, robustness)
Column: C18, 200 μm
Phase: mobile phase was acetonitrile/ultrapure water with 0
Detection: UV 480 nm
Flow: 1.00 mL/min
Temp.: 28.0 °C
Inj.: 20 μL
Gradient: elution mode (shown in Table S5) with a flow rate at…
Li Z, Li S, Li T, Gao X, Zhu L. Physiological and transcriptomic responses of Chlorella sorokiniana to ciprofloxacin reveal molecular mechanisms for antibiotic removal. iScience. 2022;25:104638. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104638
🔗 DOI🏠 PMC📚 PubMed📄 PDF
SummaryMicroalgae-based technology is an effective and environmentally friendly method for antibiotics-contaminated wastewater treatment. To assess the tolerance and removal ability of Chlorella sorokiniana to ciprofloxacin (CIP), this study comprehensively revealed the responses of C. sorokiniana to CIP exposure and its degradation processes through physiological and transcriptomic analyses. Although the photosynthetic system was inhibited, the growth of C. sorokiniana was not negatively affected by CIP. Dissolved organic matter was analyzed and indicated that humic-like substances were released to alleviate the stress of CIP. In addition, the maximum removal of CIP was 83.3% under 20 mg L−1 CIP exposure. HPLC-MS/MS and RNA-Seq analyses suggested that CIP could be bioaccumulated and biodegraded by C. sorokiniana through the reactions of hydroxylation, demethylation, ring cleavage, oxidation, dehydrogenation, and decarboxylation with the help of intracellular oxidoreductases, especially cytochrome P450. Collectively, this research shows that C. sorokiniana have a great potential for removing CIP from wastewater.
Environmental biotechnologyApplied microbiologyMicroorganism
📄
Feasibility of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction for Accelerated Cold Brew Coffee Processing: Characterization and Comparison With Conventional Brewing Methods
HPLCFrontiers in Nutrition202290% ✓CC-BYResearch method (specificity, robustness)
Column: C18, 50 μm
Phase: mobile phase flow rate of 1
Detection: UV 765 nm
Flow: 1.00 mL/min
Temp.: 95.0 °C
Inj.: 10 μL
Gradient: of a mixture of 90% mobile phase A and 10%…
Zhai X, Yang M, Zhang J, Zhang L, Tian Y, Li C, et al. Feasibility of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction for Accelerated Cold Brew Coffee Processing: Characterization and Comparison With Conventional Brewing Methods. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2022;9:849811. doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.849811
🔗 DOI🏠 PMC📚 PubMed📄 PDF
A long extraction time for traditional cold coffee brewing considerably reduces the production efficiency of this type of beverage. Herein, a new ultrasound-assisted cold brewing (UAC) method was established. The feasibility of UAC was assessed by comparison with main physicochemical characteristics, non-volatile and volatile compounds in coffee extracts produced by hot brewing and conventional static cold brewing methods. Compared to the static cold brews, the levels of total dissolved solids, total lipids, proteins, and titrated acids of UAC coffee extracts increased by 6–26%, 10–21%, 26–31%, and 12–15%, respectively. Caffeine, chlorogenic acid, and trigonelline concentrations were also determined by HPLC. Based on the volatile profiles obtained by HS-SPME-GC/MS, the aroma compounds in UAC was significantly different (p < 0.05) from hot brews but similar to static cold ones, suggesting that ultrasonication compensated for the time of the static cold brewing, thereby considerably shortening the extraction time (1 h vs. 12 h). This work demonstrated that the combination of ultrasound-assisted with cold brew could produce coffee with good flavor and increase the extraction efficiency, which may provide an option for the acceleration of the cold brew coffee process.
coffeecold brewhot brewultrasound-assisted extractionvolatile compounds
📈 Method Validation (ICH Q2)

No validation data. Contact the method author.

Parameters per: ICH Q2(R2) ↗

📋 Method comparison
Technique Column Analysis time Detection Mobile phase Source
HPLC C18 — MS mobile phase A, sodium acetate–triethylamine solution (pH 6 DOI ↗
HPLC C18 — UV 480 nm mobile phase was acetonitrile/ultrapure water with 0 DOI ↗
HPLC C18 — UV 765 nm mobile phase flow rate of 1 DOI ↗
🔧 Troubleshooting HPLC/GC
Broad peaks / tailing
Causes: Worn column, wrong mobile-phase pH, column overload, dead volume
Solution: Replace the column, check buffer pH (±0.2), reduce injection volume, check fittings
Baseline drift
Causes: Contaminated mobile phase, gradient issues, unstable temperature
Solution: Degas the phase, filter 0.22 µm, stabilise column temperature, flush the system
No peak
Causes: Wrong wavelength, analyte does not elute, thermal decomposition, wrong phase
Solution: Check λmax, extend the gradient, lower the temperature, change the mobile phase
Ghost peaks
Causes: System contamination, carry-over, contaminated vials
Solution: Clean the system (MeOH/H₂O), use new vials, inject a blank
Low recovery
Causes: Adsorption to walls, insufficient extraction, decomposition
Solution: Add IS, silanise glassware, optimise extraction, check stability

Sources: Snyder, Kirkland & Dolan ↗, Waters ↗

📊 HPLC method validation (ICH Q2(R1)) PARTIAL

3 metrics need experimental data

Parameter Value Unit ICH Q2 criterion Status
Linearity (R²) no data unitless R² ≥ 0.999 (≥0.99 for bioanalytical) —
LOD (S/N = 3:1) no data ng/mL S/N ≥ 3:1 (lowest detectable concentration) —
LOQ (S/N = 10:1) no data ng/mL S/N ≥ 10:1 (LOQ ≥ 3×LOD typically) —
Precision (RSD intraday, n=6) no data % RSD RSD ≤ 2% (intraday) / ≤ 3% (interday) for the API —
Accuracy (recovery, 3 levels) no data % (target 100±2%) Recovery 98-102% (target 100%) —
Linearity range no data e.g. 0.1-100 ng/mL Min. 80-120% of the nominal concentration —
Selectivity/Specificity no data qualitative No interference — analyte peak fully resolved (Rs ≥ 2.0) —
Robustness no data RSD < 2% at ±5% variation RSD < 2% under small parameter variations —
Legend: ✓ PASS ⚠ CAUTION ✗ FAIL — NO_DATA
📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date) — click to expand

Analytical method validation standards — 4 independent sources (ICH + USP + AOAC + Snyder).

  1. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). 2005. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1). ICH Expert Working Group. [link ↗] — Gold-standard ICH guideline — accepted by EMA, FDA, MHLW, NMPA
  2. United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Convention. 2024. USP General Chapter <621> Chromatography. USP-NF 2024 ed. USP. [link ↗]
  3. AOAC International. 2016. Appendix F: Guidelines for Standard Method Performance Requirements. AOAC INTERNATIONAL. [link ↗] — AOAC SMPR — alternative to ICH Q2 for food/dietary supplements
  4. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-16754-0. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 [link ↗] — Industry standard textbook — Chapter 11 covers method validation
  5. Snyder, L. R., J. J. Kirkland, and J. L. Glajch. 1997. Practical HPLC Method Development. 2nd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-00703-6. — Classic method-development reference (DryLab heritage).
  6. Rozet, Eric, et al.. 2013. Analysis of recent pharmaceutical regulatory documents on analytical method validation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.111 [link ↗] — Comparison of FDA / EMA / ICH validation expectations — used for ICH Q2(R1) interpretation.
  7. Heyden, Yvan Vander, et al.. 2009. Robustness of pharmaceutical liquid chromatographic methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.10.052 [link ↗] — Plackett-Burman design for robustness — basis of ICH Q2 §3.7.
  8. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists. 2nd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-119-31378-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793 [link ↗] — Modern (UHPLC) update of validation chapter — practical RSD/LOD examples.
  9. Meyer, Veronika R.. 2010. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. 5th ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-68218-0. — European pharmacopeial perspective — complements USP/AOAC.
  10. Kazakevich, Yuri V., and Rosario LoBrutto, eds.. 2007. HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists. Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 978-0-471-68162-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470087954 [link ↗] — Pharma-focused validation case studies (specificity, robustness).
  11. European Medicines Agency (EMA). 2011. Guideline on bioanalytical method validation EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009. EMA Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. [link ↗] — EMA bioanalytical companion to ICH Q2(R1) for clinical samples.

· ⚠ SVHC/REACH regulatory warnings ↑

🔧 HPLC troubleshooting — decision tree 6 common problems

Diagnostics for the 12 most common HPLC problems with a decision tree (5 steps per problem). Source: Snyder/Kirkland/Dolan 3rd ed. Chapter 17 + LCGC LC Troubleshooting columns 1989-2024.

Broad peaks medium

Symptom: All peaks on the chromatogram are wider than expected (FWHM > 2× normal)

🔍 Diagnostic tree:
  1. 1. Check whether all peaks are broadened or only some
    → YES: All → instrumental problem (column or system)
    → NO: Only some → chemistry problem (interaction with the column for specific analytes)
  2. 2. Swap in a test column — does the problem disappear?
    → YES: COLUMN worn out — packing damaged, void in the first few mm. Replace it.
    → NO: Problem in the LC system
  3. 3. Check the dead volume — injection loop, connections, detector
    → YES: Loop > 100 µL for a 4.6 mm column or loose connections → replace ferrules, shorten tubing
    → NO: Continue diagnostics
  4. 4. Temperature test: raise the column from 25°C to 40°C
    → YES: Narrower peaks → mass-transfer kinetics too slow (increase T)
    → NO: Continue
  5. 5. Check flow rate vs the optimal van Deemter value for this column
    → YES: Optimum for 4.6mm/5µm = 1.0 mL/min, for 2.1mm/3µm = 0.4 mL/min
    → NO: Continue
⚠️ Common causes:
  • Column worn out (>2000 injections without a guard)
  • System dead volume > 100 µL (wrong loop, long tubing, loose ferrules)
  • Temperature too low (mass-transfer kinetics)
  • Flow rate outside the van Deemter optimum
  • Sample solvent stronger than mobile phase A
✓ Fixes:
  • ✓ Replace the column (when >2000 injections)
  • ✓ Check all connections — keep tubing as short as possible
  • ✓ Increase column T to 40°C (if the substance is stable)
  • ✓ Reduce flow to the van Deemter optimum
  • ✓ Dissolve the sample in mobile phase A (not in pure organic)
Peak tailing (T > 1.5) high

Symptom: Peaks have an extended "tail" on the late-elution side (asymmetry T = b/a > 1.5 per USP)

🔍 Diagnostic tree:
  1. 1. Does the substance contain basic groups (amino, pyridine)?
    → YES: Yes → silanol interactions! Add 0.1% TFA or 5-10 mM TEA to mobile phase A.
    → NO: Continue
  2. 2. Check the mobile-phase pH vs the substance pKa
    → YES: pH = pKa ± 1 → partial ionization, peak split. Move pH ≥ 2 units away from pKa.
    → NO: Continue
  3. 3. Check the column age (>1500 injections?)
    → YES: Yes → exposed silanols (column bleed). Replace with a column with higher endcapping (XTerra, Symmetry).
    → NO: Continue
  4. 4. Does the sample contain metals (Fe, Cu from glass vials)?
    → YES: Yes → use type II clear vials or PFA. Add 0.1mM EDTA to the sample.
    → NO: Continue
⚠️ Common causes:
  • Silanol interactions (basic analyte + silica gel free silanols)
  • pH at the boundary of the analyte pKa (peak split)
  • Old column (column bleed, high silanol activity)
  • Metals in the sample (chelation → tailing)
  • Column overload (>50 µg on a 4.6mm column)
✓ Fixes:
  • ✓ Add 0.1% TFA (UV) or 0.1% formic acid (LC-MS) to mobile phase A
  • ✓ Choose a column with high-purity endcapping: Waters XBridge BEH, Phenomenex Kinetex
  • ✓ Work at pH ≥ 2 units away from pKa
  • ✓ Add 0.1mM EDTA to the sample (Fe/Cu chelation)
  • ✓ Reduce the injection volume to ≤ 20 µL for a 4.6mm column
Baseline drift medium

Symptom: The baseline rises or falls systematically for >5 minutes

🔍 Diagnostic tree:
  1. 1. Are you running a gradient (B% increasing)?
    → YES: Yes → different absorption of phases A vs B at dλ. Solvent change in UV cutoff. Check the % organic UV absorbance.
    → NO: Continue (isocratic)
  2. 2. Check the column temperature — is it stable to ±0.5°C?
    → YES: Yes (stable) → continue
    → NO: Unstable → turn on the column thermostat (>25°C controlled)
  3. 3. Test: turn off the autosampler, run pump+column+detector alone
    → YES: Drift disappears → autosampler contamination (clean the needle, septum)
    → NO: Continue
  4. 4. Check the lamp age (D2 for UV)
    → YES: Yes (>1500 hours) → replace the lamp
    → NO: Continue
⚠️ Common causes:
  • Gradient elution with different UV cutoff of the phases
  • Unstable column T
  • Autosampler contamination of the needle/septum
  • Old UV lamp (>1500h)
  • Detector flow cell fouled
  • Column not equilibrated (<10 column volumes)
✓ Fixes:
  • ✓ Pre-equilibrate the column for 10-15 column volumes at 100% A
  • ✓ Column thermostat on, T 30-40°C stable
  • ✓ Clean the detector flow cell with 50:50 ACN:H2O
  • ✓ Replace the D2 lamp if >1500h
  • ✓ Use baseline subtraction (Chromeleon, Empower native function)
No peak / lost peak critical

Symptom: The expected analyte peak does not appear on the chromatogram

🔍 Diagnostic tree:
  1. 1. Did the injection actually take place?
    → YES: Check the autosampler log, pump pressure (should drop during injection)
    → NO: Autosampler problem → check the loop, needle, sample in the vial
  2. 2. Is the sample in the vial (correct volume, not evaporated)?
    → YES: Continue
    → NO: No sample — re-pipette
  3. 3. Sample stability — prepared >24h ago?
    → YES: Yes → degradation. Re-prepare a fresh sample.
    → NO: Continue
  4. 4. Check the detection wavelength vs the substance λmax
    → YES: Detection at λ does NOT match λmax → no signal. Scan DAD 200-400nm.
    → NO: Continue
  5. 5. Test: inject a pure standard (of known concentration, fresh)
    → YES: The standard gives a peak → problem with the sample (matrix, derivatization)
    → NO: No peak even with the standard → system problem (column, phase, gradient)
⚠️ Common causes:
  • Sample not drawn from the vial (autosampler bug)
  • Sample degraded (>24h pH/temp/light)
  • Detection at the wrong wavelength
  • Wrong mobile phase (e.g. forgotten TFA)
  • Column reversed / wrong stationary phase
  • Substance elutes at the front (V0) → unretained, not visible
✓ Fixes:
  • ✓ Re-prepare a fresh sample per the exact protocol
  • ✓ UV-Vis DAD scan 200-400nm + search for λmax
  • ✓ Check the mobile-phase composition — was TFA added?
  • ✓ Test the reverse column direction (carefully!)
  • ✓ For retention <1 min — lower the % B, MeOH instead of ACN
  • ✓ Check the "expected_rt" table in wp_molgod_hplc_methods
Pressure too high critical

Symptom: Pump pressure > 80% of the column max or system shutdown with a high-pressure error

🔍 Diagnostic tree:
  1. 1. Check that the column is connected correctly (arrow direction)
    → YES: OK
    → NO: Column reversed → flip it (never run it "backwards")
  2. 2. Test: remove the column from the system, run pump+detector alone
    → YES: Pressure drops to <50 bar → problem in the column (clogged)
    → NO: Pressure stays high → in-line filter clogged, frit fouled
  3. 3. Check the pre-column filter (in-line frit)
    → YES: Fouled and brown → replace it
    → NO: Continue
  4. 4. Back-flush the column with 50:50 ACN:H2O without the column — does it disappear?
    → YES: Particles stuck in the first mm — a 30 min flush may recover it
    → NO: Replace the column
⚠️ Common causes:
  • In-line filter (frit) clogged with particles
  • Buffer salting out (precipitation at high %B)
  • Sample contains suspended matter (filter 0.22 µm before injection)
  • Column clogged (column bed compaction)
  • Gradient with a buffer phase + high organic → salt precipitation
✓ Fixes:
  • ✓ ALWAYS filter the sample through 0.22 µm PVDF before injection
  • ✓ Replace the in-line filter every 100 injections (or when pressure rises >20%)
  • ✓ Do NOT use >20mM phosphate buffer + >70% ACN (the salt precipitates)
  • ✓ Flush the column for 30 min with 50:50 ACN:H2O in the reverse direction (when the manufacturer allows it)
  • ✓ Pre-column 4×3mm to protect the main column
Ghost peaks high

Symptom: Unexplained peaks on the chromatogram absent from the calibration

🔍 Diagnostic tree:
  1. 1. Test: blank injection (pure sample solvent)
    → YES: A ghost appears → contamination of the system or eluents
    → NO: Appears only with the sample → matrix
  2. 2. Does the ghost grow with the gradient (elutes at high %B)?
    → YES: Yes → overloaded column or strong-retained from a previous run
    → NO: Independent of the gradient → autosampler carryover
  3. 3. Increase carryover wash (between injections)
    → YES: Helps → carryover was to blame. Use a stronger wash protocol.
    → NO: Continue
  4. 4. Pure water injection — is there a peak?
    → YES: Yes → contamination of the water source (organics from the DI system)
    → NO: Continue
⚠️ Common causes:
  • Carryover in the autosampler needle/loop
  • Eluent contamination (even HPLC-grade)
  • Strong-retained components from previous runs
  • Plastic in the vials (phthalates, PEG from the caps)
  • Insufficiently purified DI water
✓ Fixes:
  • ✓ Strengthen the wash protocol: 100% B → 100% A → 50:50 (3 cycles)
  • ✓ Strong wash: 100% DMSO or 100% MeOH before calibration
  • ✓ Filter the eluents through 0.22 µm PTFE if in doubt
  • ✓ Use amber glass + Teflon-lined caps for samples
  • ✓ Periodic gradient ramp to 100% B for 10 min (clean-out)
📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date) — click to expand
  1. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons. Chapter 17 (Troubleshooting) pp. 559-616. ISBN 978-0-470-16754-0. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 [link ↗]
  2. Dolan, John W.. 2014. LC Troubleshooting (monthly column 1989-2024). LCGC North America. [link ↗] — John Dolan 35-letnia seria miesięcznych artykułów problemowych
  3. Kromidas, Stavros. 2017. HPLC Made to Measure: A Practical Handbook for Optimization. 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-31377-1. — Praktyczny przewodnik problem-solving dla labs analitycznych
  4. Dolan, John W.. 2013. When to Modify Method Conditions. 192-199. [link ↗] — Decision flow for changing flow rate / temperature / %B vs swapping columns.
  5. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists. 2nd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-119-31378-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793 [link ↗] — Chapter 9 covers troubleshooting modern UHPLC systems (sub-2 µm particles).
  6. Meyer, Veronika R.. 2010. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. 5th ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-68218-0. — Solid step-by-step problem isolation chapter (eluents, columns, instruments).
  7. Snyder, L. R., J. J. Kirkland, and J. L. Glajch. 1997. Practical HPLC Method Development. 2nd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-00703-6. — Method-development companion volume with troubleshooting cross-refs.
  8. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. The new physical chemistry of HPLC. 1764-1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗] — Theoretical basis for diagnosing efficiency losses (mass-transfer, eddy diffusion).
  9. Heyden, Yvan Vander, et al.. 2009. Robustness of pharmaceutical liquid chromatographic methods. 2120-2129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.10.052 [link ↗] — How to diagnose method failures vs. system failures (Plackett-Burman).
  10. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. 100 Years of Chromatography. 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-33473-5. — Historical context for ghost-peak phenomenology (silica chemistry).
  11. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial. 519-531. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03506 [link ↗]
  12. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. The new physical chemistry of HPLC. 1764-1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗]
  13. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations. 1167-1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026 [link ↗]
  14. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. 100 Years of Chromatography. 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-33473-5.
  15. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography. 8525-8531. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z [link ↗]
🧪 Solubility and solvent compatibility MolGod_SOLUB_1
Molecule
Aceton
Formula
C₃H₆O
logP
-0.10
Mass (g/mol)
58.08
Polarity
Hydrophilic (polar)

⚠️ HSP estimate (literature / group contribution). Indicative data — does not replace experimental studies.

Solvent Compat. Ra Visual GC-MS HPLC Applications References
Water (H₂O)− Poor35.7
✗ NieA (aqueous) (RP)
buffercell cultureanalyticalhydrophilic extraction
Ethanol (EtOH)− Poor12.5
✗ NieA/B modifier (RP/NP)
extractionspectroscopy (UV-Vis)synthesisHPLC modifier
Methanol (MeOH)− Poor15.4
✗ NieA/B (RP) (RP)
HPLC (eluent)LC-MSKarl FischerUV-transparent do 205 nm
Acetone+ Good0.0
✗ NieB modifier (NP)
GC headspacecrystallizationdegreasingsynthesis
Acetonitrile (ACN)~ Avg.7.7
✗ NieB (RP) (RP)
HPLC eluent (gold standard)LC-MS (wolny cut-off UV 190 nm)peptide analysis
DMSO~ Avg.8.9
✗ NieN/A (N/A)
NMR (d6-DMSO)cell biology (cryopreservation)drug deliverysynthesis
THF+ Good5.5
✗ NieB (NP) (NP)
GPC/SEC (polymer analysis)Grignard synthesisorganometallic
DCM (CH₂Cl₂)+ Good6.8
✓ TakB (NP) (NP)
extractionNP-HPLCGC-MScrystallization (anti-solvent)
Chloroform (CHCl₃)~ Avg.8.7
✓ TakN/A (toxic) (N/A)
NMR (CDCl3)lipid extraction (Folch method)NP-TLC
Hexane− Poor12.6
✓ TakA (NP) (NP)
NP-HPLCoil extraction (lipids)GC-MSTLC (NP)
Toluene− Poor11.4
✓ TakB (NP) (NP)
NMR (d8-toluene)synthesisDean-Stark azeotropic drying
📚 Scientific references for solvents (Chicago Author-Date) — click to expand

11 solvents × 5 independent scientific sources (NIST/CRC/IARC/Hansen/Reichardt/Smallwood/Wypych/Armarego/Snyder/GESTIS). 55+ full citations below.

Water (H₂O)
  1. NIST — NIST Chemistry WebBook — Water (CAS 7732-18-5)
  2. CRC — CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 104th ed., Sec. 8 (Properties of Water)
  3. IAPWS — IAPWS Release on Static Dielectric Constant of Water
  4. Reichardt 2011 — Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry
  5. GESTIS — GESTIS Substance Database — Water
Ethanol (EtOH)
  1. NIST — NIST Chemistry WebBook — Ethanol (CAS 64-17-5)
  2. CRC — CRC Handbook — Ethanol physical constants
  3. Snyder & Kirkland — Modern Liquid Chromatography — Ethanol eluotropic
  4. Smallwood — Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties — Ethanol
  5. GESTIS — GESTIS Substance Database — Ethanol
Methanol (MeOH)
  1. NIST — NIST Chemistry WebBook — Methanol (CAS 67-56-1)
  2. CRC — CRC Handbook — Methanol physical constants
  3. Snyder & Kirkland — Modern Liquid Chromatography — MeOH eluotropic, eo=0.95
  4. GESTIS — GESTIS Substance Database — Methanol
Acetone
  1. NIST — NIST Chemistry WebBook — Acetone (CAS 67-64-1)
  2. CRC — CRC Handbook — Acetone physical & thermodynamic constants
  3. Hansen 2007 — Hansen Solubility Parameters — Acetone (dD=15.5, dP=10.4, dH=7.0)
  4. Smallwood — Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties — Acetone
  5. GESTIS — GESTIS Substance Database — Acetone
Acetonitrile (ACN)
  1. NIST — NIST Chemistry WebBook — Acetonitrile (CAS 75-05-8)
  2. CRC — CRC Handbook — Acetonitrile constants
  3. Snyder & Kirkland — Modern Liquid Chromatography — ACN gold-standard HPLC eluent
  4. Reichardt 2011 — Solvents and Solvent Effects — ACN dipolar aprotic
  5. GESTIS — GESTIS Substance Database — Acetonitrile
DMSO
  1. NIST — NIST Chemistry WebBook — DMSO (CAS 67-68-5)
  2. Wypych 2019 — Handbook of Solvents Vol. 1 — DMSO comprehensive properties
  3. Hansen 2007 — HSP — DMSO (dD=18.4, dP=16.4, dH=10.2)
  4. Reichardt 2011 — Solvents and Solvent Effects — DMSO E_T(30)=45.1, dipolar aprotic
  5. GESTIS — GESTIS Substance Database — DMSO
THF
  1. NIST — NIST Chemistry WebBook — THF (CAS 109-99-9)
  2. Armarego 2009 — Purification of Laboratory Chemicals — THF drying & peroxide test
  3. Hansen 2007 — Hansen Solubility Parameters — THF (dD=16.8, dP=5.7, dH=8.0)
  4. Smallwood — Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties — THF
  5. GESTIS — GESTIS Substance Database — Tetrahydrofuran
DCM (CH₂Cl₂)
  1. NIST — NIST Chemistry WebBook — Dichloromethane (CAS 75-09-2)
  2. IARC 71 — IARC Monograph 71 — DCM (Group 2A carcinogen)
  3. Hansen 2007 — Hansen Solubility Parameters — DCM (dD=18.2, dP=6.3, dH=6.1)
  4. Reichardt 2011 — Solvents and Solvent Effects — DCM polarity index
  5. GESTIS — GESTIS Substance Database — Dichloromethane
Chloroform (CHCl₃)
  1. NIST — NIST Chemistry WebBook — Chloroform (CAS 67-66-3)
  2. IARC 73 — IARC Monograph 73 — Chloroform (Group 2B carcinogen)
  3. Hansen 2007 — Hansen Solubility Parameters — CHCl3 (dD=17.8, dP=3.1, dH=5.7)
  4. Reichardt 2011 — Solvents and Solvent Effects — CHCl3 H-bond donor strength
  5. GESTIS — GESTIS Substance Database — Chloroform
n-Hexane
  1. NIST — NIST Chemistry WebBook — n-Hexane (CAS 110-54-3)
  2. ATSDR n-Hexane — ATSDR Toxicological Profile for n-Hexane — neuropatia obwodowa (n-Heksan NIE jest kancerogenem IARC)
  3. Hansen 2007 — Hansen Solubility Parameters — n-Hexane (dD=14.9, dP=0, dH=0)
  4. Snyder & Kirkland — Modern Liquid Chromatography — n-Hexane NP standard, eo=0.00
  5. GESTIS — GESTIS Substance Database — n-Hexane
Toluene
  1. NIST — NIST Chemistry WebBook — Toluene (CAS 108-88-3)
  2. IARC 71 — IARC Monograph 71 — Toluene
  3. Hansen 2007 — Hansen Solubility Parameters — Toluene (dD=18.0, dP=1.4, dH=2.0)
  4. Smallwood — Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties — Toluene
  5. GESTIS — GESTIS Substance Database — Toluene
Solubility theory (applied in compatibility prediction):
  1. Yalkowsky, Samuel H., and Shri C. Valvani. 1980. "Solubility and Partitioning I: Solubility of Nonelectrolytes in Water." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 69 (8): 912–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600690814 — General Solubility Equation (GSE): logS = 0.5 − logP − 0.01(MP−25).
  2. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006834 — HSP triplet (dD, dP, dH) + Ra formula.
  3. Stefanis, E., and C. Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." Int J Thermophys 29: 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0415-z
  4. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220 — E_T(30) polarity scale, solwatochromia.
  5. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 — Eluotropic series, polarity index.
  6. Van Krevelen, D. W., and K. Te Nijenhuis. 2009. Properties of Polymers. 4th ed. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-054819-7.X0001-5 — Hoftyzer–Van Krevelen group contribution dla dD/dP/dH z SMILES.
  7. Marcus, Yizhak. 1998. The Properties of Solvents. Wiley Series in Solution Chemistry, Vol. 4. ISBN 9780471983699 — Complete tabular set of 250+ solvents (ε, μ, donicity, acceptor numbers).
  8. PubChem Compound Database — CAS 67-64-1 lookup ↗ — logP (XLogP3), water solubility experimental + predicted.

Full bibliography in the REFERENCES accordion (at the bottom of the page) — Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed., Author-Date.

📚 Technical FAQ — Aceton (5) MolGod_TECHFAQ_1
❓ Jak przygotować roztwór standardowy acetonu o stężeniu 1 mol/L?
Aby przygotować roztwór standardowy acetonu (CAS 67-64-1) o stężeniu 1 mol/L, należy odważyć masę substancji zgodnie ze wzorem: masa [g] = stężenie [mol/L] × objętość [L] × masa molowa [g/mol]. Dla 1 mol/L i 1 L roztworu, masa acetonu wynosi: 1 mol/L × 1 L × 58.08 g/mol = 58.08 g. Następnie rozpuścić 58.08 g acetonu w wodzie destylowanej do objętości 1 L.
Helpful?
❓ W jakich warunkach należy przechowywać aceton czysty (CAS 67-64-1)?
Aceton czysty (CAS 67-64-1) powinien być przechowywany w temperaturze pokojowej (15-25°C), z dala od bezpośredniego światła słonecznego i źródeł ciepła. Wilgotność względna powietrza nie powinna przekraczać 60%. Przechowywać w szczelnie zamkniętym pojemniku, aby uniknąć parowania i zanieczyszczenia.
Helpful?
❓ Jaka metoda analityczna jest odpowiednia do analizy acetonu (CAS 67-64-1) w zależności od jego logP?
Dla acetonu (logP ≈ -0.9), ze względu na niską lipofilność i masę molową 58.08 g/mol, zalecaną metodą analityczną jest chromatografia gazowa (GC) z detektorem płomieniowo-jonizacyjnym (FID). Alternatywnie, można zastosować wysokosprawną chromatografię cieczową (HPLC) z odpowiednim układem fazowym, jeśli wymagana jest wyższa rozdzielczość lub analiza w środowisku wodnym.
Helpful?
❓ Jakie są potencjalne reaktywności i niezgodności chemiczne acetonu (CAS 67-64-1)?
Aceton (CAS 67-64-1) jest rozpuszczalnikiem polarnym, ale może reagować z silnymi utleniaczami (np. nadtlenkami) oraz kwasami nieorganicznymi w wysokich temperaturach. Nie należy go mieszać z reduktorami organicznymi (np. NaBH4), które mogą prowadzić do egzotermicznych reakcji. Aceton jest również niekompatybilny z niektórymi tworzywami sztucznymi, takimi jak polistyren i polietylen, które może rozpuszczać.
Helpful?
❓ W jakich praktycznych zastosowaniach laboratoryjnych wykorzystuje się aceton (CAS 67-64-1)?
Aceton (CAS 67-64-1) jest powszechnie stosowany jako rozpuszczalnik w syntezie organicznej, np. do rozpuszczania tłuszczów, olejów i żywic. Służy również do oczyszczania szkła laboratoryjnego, jako eluent w chromatografii oraz jako środek do usuwania lakierów i powłok. W analizie chemicznej wykorzystuje się go do przygotowania próbek i rozcieńczania ekstraktów.
Helpful?
🧮 Laboratory calculators (8) MolGod_LABCALC_1
Dilution (C₁V₁=C₂V₂)
Molarity (M=n/V)
pH Buffer (Henderson-Hasselbalch)
Beer-Lambert (A=εcl)
Mass → Moles
Concentration % → M
ppm → mg/L
Temperature C↔F↔K

Verified formulas: IUPAC Gold Book ↗, DOI ↗

📊 Spectroscopic Databases MolGod_SPECDB_3
📋 Laboratory protocol generator MolGod_PROTOCOL_1

Protocol generated based on: GHS SDS, Aldrich Lab Guide ↗

🏷️ Label generator (QR) MolGod_LABEL_1
Acetone• Propan-2-one / Dimethyl ketone• CAS: 67-64-1• Formula: C3H6O• Mass: 58.08 g/molDANGERGHS HAZARD STATEMENTS:H225: Highly flammable liquid and vapourH336: May cause drowsiness or dizzinessH319: Causes serious eye irritationEUH066: Repeated exposure may cause skin dryness or cracking.DH ScientificScience first. Commerce as consequence.Batch No.: Netto Mass: MFG:
ADMET — Pharmacological Profile

Drug-likeness radar chart (Lipinski Ro5 / Veber). Green zone = compliance with criteria.

Predictive data — properties calculated in silico (SMILES/RDKit). These do not replace clinical studies. Do not use for drug evaluation without experimental verification.

MW58.1LogP-0.1HBD0HBA1RotB0TPSA17.1 Ų
✓ Lipinski Ro5✓ Veber✓ Egan✗ Ghose (MW=58)✗ REOS (MW=58)✓ Lead-like Ro3
PropertyValueRating
Absorption (GI)high✓
BBB permeabilityyes (crosses)
Bioavailability (Daina 2017)
55%
CYP450 profileCYP1A2 non-inhibitorCYP2C9 non-inhibitorCYP2C19 non-inhibitorCYP2D6 non-inhibitorCYP3A4 non-inhibitor
PAINS alerts0✓
Brenk alerts0✓
pKa (pH 7.4)7 (heuristic)
hERG (cardiotox.)✓ no
P-gp substrate—
Ames mutagenicity✓ no
DILI (hepatotox.)—
LogS (aq. solub.)—
Sources (ADMET methodology)
  1. Lipinski, Christopher A., Franco Lombardo, Beryl W. Dominy, and Paul J. Feeney. 1997. "Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings." Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 23 (1-3): 3-25.
  2. Veber, Daniel F., Stephen R. Johnson, Hung-Yuan Cheng, et al. 2002. "Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (12): 2615-2623.
  3. Daina, Antoine, Olivier Michielin, and Vincent Zoete. 2017. "SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness." Scientific Reports 7: 42717.
  4. Egan, William J., and Gregory Lauri. 2002. "Prediction of intestinal permeability." Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 54 (3): 273-289.
  5. Baell, Jonathan B., and Georgina A. Holloway. 2010. "New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 53 (7): 2719-2740.
  6. Brenk, Ruth, Alessandro Schipani, Daniel James, et al. 2008. "Lessons learnt from assembling screening libraries for drug discovery for neglected diseases." ChemMedChem 3 (3): 435-444.
  7. Ertl, Peter, and Ansgar Schuffenhauer. 2009. "Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molecular complexity and fragment contributions." Journal of Cheminformatics 1: 8.
  8. Bickerton, G. Richard, Gaia V. Paolini, Jérémy Besnard, Sorel Muresan, and Andrew L. Hopkins. 2012. "Quantifying the Chemical Beauty of Drugs." Nature Chemistry 4 (2): 90-98.
  9. Hopkins, Andrew L., and Colin R. Groom. 2002. "The Druggable Genome." Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1 (9): 727-730.
  10. Ghose, Arup K., Vellarkad N. Viswanadhan, and John J. Wendoloski. 1999. "A Knowledge-Based Approach in Designing Combinatorial or Medicinal Chemistry Libraries for Drug Discovery." Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry 1 (1): 55-68.
  11. Tice, Raymond R., Christopher P. Austin, Robert J. Kavlock, and John R. Bucher. 2013. "Improving the Human Hazard Characterization of Chemicals: A Tox21 Update." Environmental Health Perspectives 121 (7): 756-765.
  12. Leeson, Paul D., and Brian Springthorpe. 2007. "The Influence of Drug-Like Concepts on Decision-Making in Medicinal Chemistry." Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 6 (11): 881-890.
  13. Hann, Michael M. 2011. "Molecular Obesity, Potency and Other Addictions in Drug Discovery." MedChemComm 2 (5): 349-355.
  14. Davies, Mark, Michał Nowotka, George Papadatos, et al. 2015. "ChEMBL Web Services: Streamlining Access to Drug Discovery Data and Utilities." Nucleic Acids Research 43 (W1): W612-W620.
  15. Walters, W. Patrick, and Mark A. Murcko. 2002. "Prediction of 'Drug-Likeness.'". Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 54 (3): 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00003-0.
  16. Congreve, Miles, Robin Carr, Christopher Murray, and Harren Jhoti. 2003. "A 'Rule of Three' for Fragment-Based Lead Discovery?" Drug Discovery Today 8 (19): 876–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02831-9.
  17. Brenk, Ruth, Alessandro Schipani, Daniel James, Agata Krasowski, Iain Hugh Gilbert, Julie Frearson, and Paul Graham Wyatt. 2008. "Lessons Learnt from Assembling Screening Libraries for Drug Discovery for Neglected Diseases." ChemMedChem 3 (3): 435-444.
  18. Schomburg, Karen T., Sascha Bietz, Hans Briem, Andrea M. Henzler, Stefan Urbaczek, and Matthias Rarey. 2014. "Facing the Challenges of Structure-Based Target Prediction by Inverse Virtual Screening." Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 54 (6): 1676-1686.
  19. Bemis, Guy W., and Mark A. Murcko. 1996. "The Properties of Known Drugs. 1. Molecular Frameworks." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 39 (15): 2887-2893.
  20. Schomburg, Karen T., and Matthias Rarey. 2014. "What Is the Potential of Structure-Based Target Prediction Methods?" Future Medicinal Chemistry 6 (17): 1987-1989.
  21. Vellasco Júnior, Walcimar T. 2011. "Acetone (CAS No. 67-64-1)." Revista Virtual de Química. DOI: 10.5935/1984-6835.20110037. [DOI ↗]
  22. Vellasco Júnior, Walcimar T.. 2011. "Acetone (CAS No. 67-64-1)." Revista Virtual de Química 3 (4). https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-6835.20110037. [DOI ↗]
  23. Anonymous. "Acetone for industrial use.". https://doi.org/10.3403/00164997. [DOI ↗]
  24. W. T. Vellasco. 2011. "ACETONA (CAS No. 67-64-1)." DOI: 10.5935/1984-6835.20110037. [DOI ↗]
  25. V. Junior, T. Walcimar. 2011. "Acetona (CAS 67-64-1)." DOI: 10.5935/RVQ.V3I4.196. [DOI ↗]
  26. D. Dietz. 1991. "NTP technical report on the toxicity studies of Acetone in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Drinking Water Studies) (CAS No. 67-64-1)." Toxicity report series.
  27. 1991. "NTP technical report on the toxicity studies of Acetone in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Drinking Water Studies) (CAS No. 67-64-1)."
  28. Bolton, Evan E., Yanli Wang, Paul A. Thiessen, and Stephen H. Bryant. 2008. "PubChem: Integrated Platform of Small Molecules and Biological Activities." Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry 4: 217-241. [DOI ↗]
  29. Kim, Sunghwan, Jie Chen, Tiejun Cheng, et al. 2023. "PubChem 2023 update." Nucleic Acids Research 51 (D1): D1373-D1380. [DOI ↗]
  30. Kim, Sunghwan, Tiejun Cheng, Jianyong He, Chen Cheng, et al. 2021. "PubChem Protein, Pathway, Reaction, and Disease Specifications." Journal of Cheminformatics 13: 16. [DOI ↗]
  31. Hähnke, Volker D., Sunghwan Kim, and Evan E. Bolton. 2018. "PubChem chemical structure standardization." Journal of Cheminformatics 10: 36. [DOI ↗]
  32. Wang, Yanli, Stephen H. Bryant, Tiejun Cheng, Jiyao Wang, et al. 2017. "PubChem BioAssay: 2017 update." Nucleic Acids Research 45 (D1): D955-D963. [DOI ↗]
  33. Cheng, Tiejun, et al. 2014. "Computation of Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients by Guiding an Additive Model with Knowledge." Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 54 (3): 793-805. [DOI ↗]
  34. F. Hill, S. Richards, B. Gibson et al. 2004. "Successful treatment without cranial radiotherapy of children receiving intensified chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results of the risk‐stratified randomized central nervous system treatment trial MRC UKALL XI (ISRC TN 16757172)." British Journal of Haematology. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04738.x. [DOI ↗]
  35. D. Gordon, G. Beastall, J. Thomson et al. 1988. "Prolonged hypogonadism in male patients with rheumatoid arthritis during flares in disease activity." British Journal of Rheumatology. DOI: 10.1093/RHEUMATOLOGY/27.6.440. [DOI ↗]
  36. CAMPBELL, A. N.; ANAND, S. C. 1972. "ChemInform Abstract: PHASENGLEICHGEWICHTE IN DEN SYST. ACETON‐METHANOL, ACETON‐CYCLOHEXAN, METHANOL‐CYCLOHEXAN UND ACETON‐METHANOL‐CYCLOHEXAN." Chemischer Informationsdienst. DOI: 10.1002/chin.197222106. [DOI ↗]
  37. Henning, K. 1968. "Zur Bestimmung von Aceton in Luft." Fresenius' Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie. DOI: 10.1007/bf00509392. [DOI ↗]
  38. Henning, K.. 1968. "Zur Bestimmung von Aceton in Luft." Fresenius' Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie 238 (1): 67-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00509392. [DOI ↗]
  39. Hatcher, W. H.; Horwood, J. F. 1936. "Aceton." Fresenius' Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie. DOI: 10.1007/bf01370863. [DOI ↗]
  40. Hatcher, W. H., Horwood, J. F.. 1936. "Aceton." Fresenius' Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie 105 (1-2): 64-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01370863. [DOI ↗]
  41. Stollé, R. 1903. "19. Zur Kondensation von Aceton mit Bernsteinsäureester." Journal für Praktische Chemie. DOI: 10.1002/prac.19030670113. [DOI ↗]
  42. Wilkinson, Mark D., et al. 2016. "The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship." Scientific Data 3: 160018. [DOI ↗]
  43. Hersey, Anne, et al. 2015. "Chemical databases: curation or integration by user-defined equivalence?" Drug Discovery Today: Technologies 14: 17-24.
  44. 2021. "Substituted pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines as PDE9 inhibitors." [ChEMBL bioactivity primary lit]
  45. Veber, Daniel F., Stephen R. Johnson, Hung-Yuan Cheng, Brian R. Smith, Keith W. Ward, and Kenneth D. Kopple. 2002. "Molecular Properties That Influence the Oral Bioavailability of Drug Candidates." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (12): 2615-2623.
  46. Levitt, David. 2024. "Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of glucocorticoids: modeling the glucocorticoid receptor dynamics and dose/response of commonly prescribed glucocorticoids." ADMET and DMPK. https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2414. [DOI ↗]
  47. Notario, Dion, Munzir, Angela Marietha, Novella, Yulina, Hananta, Linawati. 2024. "Impact of lactoferrin supplementation on cotrimoxazole pharmacokinetics: A preliminary clinical investigation." ADMET and DMPK. https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2358. [DOI ↗]
  48. ECHA. 2024. "REACH Guidance." European Chemicals Agency. ↗
  49. Sridharan, Kannan, Al Banna, Rashed, Husain, Aysha. 2021. "Evaluation of pharmacokinetics of warfarin from validated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model." ADMET and DMPK. https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.909. [DOI ↗]
  50. Disanto, A.R., Desante, K.A.. 1975. "Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of prednisone in humans." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 64 (1): 109-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600640122. [DOI ↗]
  51. Groom, Colin R., Ian J. Bruno, Matthew P. Lightfoot, and Suzanna C. Ward. 2016. "The Cambridge Structural Database." Acta Crystallographica Section B 72 (2): 171-179. ↗
  52. Mohsen A. Hedaya. 2003. "Basic Pharmacokinetics." mohsen A. hedaya. ↗
⏳ Stability & Shelf Life Advisor Arrhenius
Methodology: Arrhenius equation k = A·exp(-Ea/RT). Cite: Connors KA et al. 1986 · ICH Q1A(R2)

Enter the storage conditions → the Arrhenius algorithm will predict the remaining concentration, half-life, and usage recommendation.

Visual signs of degradation:
❄️ Storage recommendations
Temperature:
15-25°C
Light:
Ambient
Container:
Glass/HDPE
Incompatible:
Strong oxidizers, reducing agents
🧪 Solution preparation assistant (Smart Prep) MolGod_PREP_2

Enter what you want to prepare — I'll generate an SOP

Examples below — click to insert:
Preset recipes:
📚 Scientific literature overview — CAS 67-64-1MolGod_LITHUB_MAIN
⭐ Key findings (scientific literature) 7 publications
🏆 CAS 67-64-1 — multi-criteria ranking (W12): 30% citations · 20% recency · 20% topic · 15% historical · 15% open access.
  1. #1
    Cumene process for phenol and acetone (historical perspective)
    Hock, H.; Lang, S. (1979) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry
    Why it matters: Must-cite (canon) · 420 citations
    SCORE 10.92 Industrial MUST-CITE Citations: 420
  2. #2
    Kalapos, M.P. (2008) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta
    Why it matters: Must-cite (canon) · 340 citations
    SCORE 9.2 Pharmacology MUST-CITE Citations: 340 DOI ↗
  3. #3
    Liebig, J. (1832) · Annalen der Pharmacie
    Why it matters: Must-cite (canon) · 140 citations · historical paper (1832)
    SCORE 8.7 Historical MUST-CITE Citations: 140 DOI ↗
  4. #4
    Carey, F.A.; Sundberg, R.J. (2007) · Springer
    Why it matters: Must-cite (canon) · 420 citations
    SCORE 8.67 Mechanism MUST-CITE Citations: 420 DOI ↗
  5. #5
    Smith, D.; Spaněl, P. (2014) · Journal of Breath Research
    Why it matters: Must-cite (canon) · 280 citations
    SCORE 8.55 Analytics MUST-CITE Citations: 280 DOI ↗
  6. #6
    Morgott, D.A. (2005) · Patty's Toxicology
    Why it matters: Must-cite (canon) · 210 citations · review
    SCORE 6.97 Review MUST-CITE Citations: 210 DOI ↗
  7. #7
    Bruckner, J.V.; Peterson, R.G. (2000) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
    Why it matters: Must-cite (canon) · 180 citations
    SCORE 6.77 Pharmacology MUST-CITE Citations: 180 DOI ↗
📈 HPLC gradient — optimizer (LSS) TEMPLATE

Gradient based on PubChem XLogP3 + LSS (Snyder et al. 2010, ch. 9).

  • Column: C18
  • Buffer: phosphate
  • Flow: 1 mL/min
  • logP: -0.1 (PubChem XLogP3)
  • Ramp: 5% → 95% B, 10 min
  • Total analysis time: 23 min
t (min) %A %B flow (mL/min) Comment
0 95 5 1 start (equilibrium)
2 95 5 1 end of initial hold
12 5 95 1 end of LSS ramp
17 5 95 1 column wash
18 95 5 1 return to init
23 95 5 1 re-equilibration
📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date)
  1. Snyder, Lloyd R., John W. Dolan, and Joseph J. Kirkland. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. Wiley. — Chapter 9 — gradient elution, LSS theory (cited as Snyder et al. 2010 in tool description).
  2. Schoenmakers, Peter J. 1986. Optimization of Chromatographic Selectivity: A Guide to Method Development. Elsevier. — Numerical optimization of gradient programs.
  3. Snyder, L. R., and J. W. Dolan. 2007. High-Performance Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model. Wiley. — Foundational LSS reference for the %B_init = 5 + 8·logP heuristic implemented here.
  4. Nikitas, Pavlos, and Adrian Pappa-Louisi. 2009. "Retention models for isocratic and gradient elution in reversed-phase liquid chromatography." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1737-1755. [DOI ↗] — Modern review of gradient retention models — basis for non-LSS extensions.
  5. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772. [DOI ↗]
  6. Dong, Michael W. 2019. HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793. — Modern UHPLC gradient programming, sub-2 µm scaling rules.
  7. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182. [DOI ↗]
  8. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531. [DOI ↗] — Reference for orthogonal gradient design (2D-LC second dimension).
  9. Dolan, John W.. 2013. "When to Modify Method Conditions." LCGC North America 31: 192-199.
  10. Meyer, Veronika R. 2010. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Wiley. — Chapter 7 — practical gradient design with isokratyczny scouting.
  11. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531. [DOI ↗]
  12. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772. [DOI ↗]
  13. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182. [DOI ↗]
  14. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. 100 Years of Chromatography. Wiley-VCH.
  15. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531. [DOI ↗]

REST: /wp-json/molgod/v1/hplc/gradient/67-64-1

🌈 Detector + wavelength (UV/Vis) 265 nm
CompoundAcetone
λmax265 nm
λmin250 nm
εmax (M⁻¹·cm⁻¹)16
Solvent (reference)water
Suggested λ265 nm
Recommended detectorELSD
AlternativesRID, MS, CAD

Data source: Pavia 2014, ch. 6 (n→π*)

📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date) 17 refs

METODA Method Bibliography

  1. Skoog, Douglas A., F. James Holler, and Stanley R. Crouch. 2017. "Principles of Instrumental Analysis." 7th ed. Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-1-305-57721-3.
  2. Perkampus, Heinz-Helmut. 1992. "UV-VIS Spectroscopy and Its Applications." Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-77479-9. →
  3. Sadek, Paul C.. 2002. "The HPLC Solvent Guide." 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 978-0-471-41138-4.
  4. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." 3rd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-16754-0. →
  5. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. "HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists." 2nd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-119-31378-3. →
  6. Meyer, Veronika R.. 2010. "Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography." 5th ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-68218-0.
  7. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531 →
  8. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531 →
  9. Kazakevich, Yuri V., and Rosario LoBrutto, eds.. 2007. "HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists." Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 978-0-471-68162-4. →
  10. Kim, Sunghwan, et al.. 2023. "PubChem 2023 update." Nucleic Acids Research 51: D1373-D1380 →
  11. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531 →
  12. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772 →
  13. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182 →
  14. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. "100 Years of Chromatography." 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-33473-5.
  15. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531 →

REST: /wp-json/molgod/v1/hplc/detector/67-64-1

📐 HPLC peak symmetry calculator (USP Tf / As)

Calculate the USP tailing factor (Tf) and asymmetry (As) from the peak half-widths. Enter a (left half-width) and b (right half-width) measured at 5% or 10% of peak height.

📚 References (Chicago Author-Date)
  1. USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography." United States Pharmacopeial Convention. [link ↗] — Defines USP Tailing Factor T = (a+b)/(2a) measured at 5% peak height.
  2. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2023. "Validation of Analytical Procedures Q2(R2)." ICH Expert Working Group. [link ↗] — Tailing factor is a system suitability parameter (Section 6).
  3. Foley, Joe P., and John G. Dorsey. 1983. "Equations for calculation of chromatographic figures of merit for ideal and skewed peaks." Analytical Chemistry 55: 730-737 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00255a033 [link ↗] — Original asymmetry factor As = b/a at 10% height (Foley & Dorsey 1983).
  4. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 [link ↗] — Chapter 2.4 — peak shape diagnostics and remedies.
  5. Dolan, John W.. 2003. "Peak tailing and resolution." LCGC North America 21: 610-614 [link ↗] — How tailing factor degrades effective resolution.
  6. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z [link ↗] — Modern numerical deconvolution for asymmetric peaks.
  7. Kromidas, Stavros. 2017. "HPLC Made to Measure: A Practical Handbook for Optimization." Wiley-VCH. — Practical Tf and As thresholds for routine QC.
  8. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. "HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists." Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793 [link ↗]
  9. Meyer, Veronika R.. 2010. "Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography." Wiley.
  10. Heyden, Yvan Vander, et al.. 2009. "Robustness of pharmaceutical liquid chromatographic methods." Journal of Chromatography B 877: 2120-2129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.10.052 [link ↗]
  11. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03506 [link ↗]
  12. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗]
  13. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182 https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026 [link ↗]
  14. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. "100 Years of Chromatography." Wiley-VCH.
  15. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z [link ↗]
📊 Resolution and plate count calculator (Rs, N, H)

Calculate the resolution Rs, the number of theoretical plates N and HETP (H) for a pair of HPLC peaks. Enter the retention times, peak widths (at 50% or at the base) and the column length.

📚 References (Chicago Author-Date)
  1. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-16754-0. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 [link ↗] — Chapter 2 covers resolution, plate count and HETP fundamentals (Snyder et al. 2010).
  2. USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography." USP-NF 2024 ed. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. [link ↗] — Defines Rs >= 1.5 acceptance criterion and N calculation methods.
  3. Dolan, John W.. 2003. "How much resolution is enough?." LCGC North America 21: 350-353 [link ↗] — Practical guidance on Rs targets for routine method development.
  4. Van Deemter, J. J., F. J. Zuiderweg, and A. Klinkenberg. 1956. "Longitudinal diffusion and resistance to mass transfer as causes of nonideality in chromatography." Chemical Engineering Science 5: 271-289 https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(56)80003-1 [link ↗] — Origin of N = 5.54·(tr/w0.5)² half-height plate count formulation.
  5. Giddings, J. Calvin. 1965. "Dynamics of Chromatography, Part I: Principles and Theory." Marcel Dekker. ISBN 978-0-8247-1357-7. — Resolution equation Rs = (1/4)·√N·(α-1)/α·k/(1+k) (master equation).
  6. Foley, Joe P., and John G. Dorsey. 1983. "Equations for calculation of chromatographic figures of merit for ideal and skewed peaks." Analytical Chemistry 55: 730-737 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00255a033 [link ↗] — Skewed-peak corrections to apparent N.
  7. Knox, John H.. 1977. "Practical aspects of LC theory." Journal of Chromatographic Science 15: 352-364 https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/15.9.352 [link ↗]
  8. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗]
  9. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. "HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists." 2nd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-119-31378-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793 [link ↗]
  10. Meyer, Veronika R.. 2010. "Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography." 5th ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-68218-0.
  11. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03506 [link ↗]
  12. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗]
  13. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182 https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026 [link ↗]
  14. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. "100 Years of Chromatography." 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-33473-5.
  15. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z [link ↗]

Related products

🧪 System Suitability — live calculator (USP <621>)

Enter data from 5–6 injections (areas, tR, tailing, plates) — the calculator computes %RSD and means and checks compliance with USP <621>. You can paste CSV (comma-separated) or edit individual values.

📚 References (Chicago Author-Date)
  1. USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography (System Suitability section)." USP-NF 2024 ed. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. [link ↗] — Defines RSD area < 2%, tailing < 2.0, N > 2000 acceptance criteria.
  2. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2023. "Validation of Analytical Procedures Q2(R2)." ICH Expert Working Group. [link ↗] — Section 5.4 — system suitability is part of method validation.
  3. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2018. "Reviewer Guidance: Validation of Chromatographic Methods." US Food and Drug Administration. [link ↗] — CDER reviewer perspective on chromatographic validation expectations.
  4. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." 3rd ed. Wiley. — Chapter 2 — system suitability fundamentals (RSD, Tf, N).
  5. Heyden, Yvan Vander, et al.. 2009. "Robustness of pharmaceutical liquid chromatographic methods." — Robustness vs. system suitability — design-of-experiments framework.
  6. Rozet, Eric, et al.. 2013. "Analysis of recent pharmaceutical regulatory documents on analytical method validation."
  7. European Medicines Agency (EMA). 2011. "Guideline on bioanalytical method validation EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009." EMA. [link ↗] — EMA companion guideline with bioanalytical SS criteria.
  8. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. "HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists." 2nd ed. Wiley. — UHPLC-specific suitability adjustments (n=5 vs. n=6).
  9. Kazakevich, Yuri V., and Rosario LoBrutto, eds.. 2007. "HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists." Wiley-Interscience.
  10. AOAC International. 2016. "Appendix F: Guidelines for Standard Method Performance Requirements." AOAC INTERNATIONAL. [link ↗] — Alternative SS thresholds for food/dietary samples.
  11. Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial."
  12. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC."
  13. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations."
  14. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. "100 Years of Chromatography." 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH.
  15. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography."

Inne produkty z tej kategorii

📈 UV-VIS spectrum predictor (200-400 nm) λmax 265 nm MolGod_UVVIS_1
0%25%50%75%100%200250300350400265 nmA = ε·c·lA / Aₘₐₓ (%)
CompoundAcetone
λmax265 nm
λmin250 nm
εmax (M⁻¹·cm⁻¹)16
Solvent (query)water
Solvent (reference)water
Concentration (M)1e-4
Path length (cm)1
Curve FWHM30 nm

Model: Gaussian curve centered at λmax, scaled with the Beer-Lambert law A = ε · c · l. Transmittance T = 10^(-A) · 100%.

📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date)
  1. Zhi S; Zhao L; Xing Y; Zhang H; Yu C; Fei T. 2026. "Optimizing the Stability of Co(3)O(4) for Acetone Sensing by Oxygen Vacancy Alteration." ACS sensors. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.5c03258. [tło tematyczne — CAS niezweryfikowany w tej publikacji] [DOI]
  2. Zhong W; He S; Chen P; Xiang X; Liu X; Zhang C. 2026. "Upcycling Waste Etchant into a Doped-Cu(2)O Electrocatalyst for Efficient Acetoxime Synthesis from Nitrate and Acetone." Environmental science & technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c16305. [DOI]
  3. Lai Y; Liu S; Yu H; Song T; Guo J; Liu Y. 2026. "S,N-Codoped Carbon Dots Derived From Acetone and Thiourea via Solvothermal Method: A Fluorescent Probe for Ag(+) Ion Detection." Luminescence : the journal of biological and chemical luminescence. https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.70401. [DOI]
  4. Hu Y; Xie W; Wang Z; Ma J; Hou L; Wang Q. 2025. "Facile Fabrication of Room-Temperature Parts-per-Billion-Level Acetone Sensor Driven by In Situ Laser-Induced Oxygen-Vacancy-Rich Cu/Cu(2)O/CuO Composites." ACS sensors. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.5c02150. [DOI]
  5. Linstrom, Peter J., and William G. Mallard, eds. 2023. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. [DOI]
  6. Mayerhöfer, Thomas G., Samir Pahlow, and Jürgen Popp. 2020. "The Bouguer-Beer-Lambert Law: Shining Light on the Obscure." ChemPhysChem 21 (18): 2029-2046. [DOI]
  7. Skoog, Douglas A., F. James Holler, and Stanley R. Crouch. 2017. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 7th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-1-305-57721-3.
  8. Lindon, John C., George E. Tranter, and David W. Koppenaal, eds. 2017. "Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry." 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-803224-4.
  9. Field, Leslie D., Sev Sternhell, and John R. Kalman. 2013. "Organic Structures from Spectra." 5th ed. Chichester: Wiley. ISBN 978-1-119-96582-6.
  10. Reusch, William. 2013. "Virtual Textbook of Organic Chemistry: Spectroscopy." East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
  11. Lampman, Gary M., Donald L. Pavia, George S. Kriz, and James R. Vyvyan. 2010. "Spectroscopy." 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-0-495-88992-9.
  12. Kalsi, P. S. 2010. "Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds." 6th ed. New Delhi: New Age International. ISBN 978-81-224-2032-9.
  13. Williams, Dudley H., and Ian Fleming. 2008. "Spectroscopic Methods in Organic Chemistry." 6th ed. London: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-711559-0.
  14. Sadek, Paul C. 2002. The HPLC Solvent Guide. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-41242-2.
  15. Banwell, Colin N., and Elaine M. McCash. 1994. "Fundamentals of Molecular Spectroscopy." 4th ed. London: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-707976-1.
  16. Perkampus, Heinz-Helmut. 1992. UV-VIS Spectroscopy and Its Applications. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77479-9.
  17. Fieser, Louis F. 1949. "Extension of Woodward's Rules for Prediction of Conjugated Diene Absorption." Journal of the American Chemical Society 71 (5): 1854-1857. [DOI]
  18. Woodward, Robert B. 1942. "Structure and the Absorption Spectra of Alpha,Beta-Unsaturated Ketones." Journal of the American Chemical Society 64 (1): 72-75. [DOI]
  19. Beer, August. 1852. "Bestimmung der Absorption des rothen Lichts in farbigen Flüssigkeiten." Annalen der Physik und Chemie 86: 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.18521620505.
  20. Lambert, Johann Heinrich. 1760. Photometria. Augsburg: Sumptibus Vidae.

📖 Wartość λmax = 265 nm pochodzi z bazy/literatury. Brak niezależnego potwierdzenia krzyżowego (NIST / CrossRef / PubChem) — weryfikacja krzyżowa niedostępna.

REST: /wp-json/molgod/v1/spectra/uv-vis/67-64-1?solvent=water&path_length_cm=1

☣️ Toxicity (LD50 / LC50) Not classifiedMolGod_LD50_1
LD50
5800 mg/kg
Gatunek / droga
Rat / doustnie
Klasyfikacja
Practically nontoxic
Skala GHS (Acute Toxicity, oral, mg/kg bw):
Cat 1 (≤5)
Cat 2 (5–50)
Cat 3 (50–300)
Cat 4 (300–2000)
Cat 5 (2000–5000)

Source: RTECS AL3150000; ECHA Brief Profile Acetone 2023 (2023). CAS 67-64-1.

LD50/LC50 data are for guidance only; they do not replace the safety data sheet (SDS) or expert toxicological assessment. GHS classification for the oral route (mg/kg bw) per UN GHS, 10th rev. 2023, Annex 1 §3.1.1.

Bibliography (Chicago)
  • Hodge, Harold C., and James H. Sterner. 1949. "Tabulation of toxicity classes." American Industrial Hygiene Association Quarterly 10 (4): 93-96.
  • U.S. EPA. 2024. "ChemView." https://chemview.epa.gov/.
  • United Nations. 2023. "Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)." 10th rev. ed. New York: UN.
  • Lipnick, Robert L., et al. 1995. "Comparison of the up-and-down, conventional LD50, and fixed-dose acute toxicity procedures." Food and Chemical Toxicology 33 (3): 223-231.
  • ATSDR. 2024. "Toxicological Profiles." Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/.
  • Hayes, Wallace, and Claire L. Kruger, eds. 2014. "Hayes' Principles and Methods of Toxicology." 6th ed. CRC Press.
  • Lewis, Richard J. 2012. "Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials." 12th ed. Wiley.
  • IARC. 2024. "Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans." International Agency for Research on Cancer (per kryteria klasyfikacji rakotwórczości IARC Group 1/2A/2B).
  • Pohanish, Richard P. 2017. "Sittig's Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens." 7th ed. Elsevier.
  • Bingham, Eula, Barbara Cohrssen, and Charles H. Powell, eds. 2012. "Patty's Toxicology." 6th ed. Wiley.
  • WHO. 2023. "Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard." World Health Organization (zgodne z UN GHS Annex 1 §3.1.1).
🧪 Classic synthesis routes1 historical routeMolGod_SYNTH_2

Historically verified synthesis routes. Citations in Chicago author-date style.

Route 1: Cumene process (with phenol coproduct) (1944)
Named reaction: Hock rearrangement
Starting materials: Cumene (isopropylbenzene); air (O2)
Conditions: Autoxidation to cumene hydroperoxide 90-130 C; H2SO4-catalyzed Hock cleavage 60-80 C
Yield: 95.0 %
Hock, Heinrich, and Shon Lang. 1944. "Autoxydation von Kohlenwasserstoffen, IX. Mitteil.: Über Peroxyde von Benzol-Derivaten." Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 77 (3-4): 257-264.
General bibliography (Chicago):
  • March, Jerry, and Michael B. Smith. 2020. "March's Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms, and Structure." 8th ed. Wiley.
  • Carey, Francis A., and Richard J. Sundberg. 2007. "Advanced Organic Chemistry, Part B: Reactions and Synthesis." 5th ed. Springer.
  • Corey, E. J., and Xue-Min Cheng. 1995. "The Logic of Chemical Synthesis." Wiley.
  • Greene, Theodora W., and Peter G. M. Wuts. 2014. "Greene's Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis." 5th ed. Wiley.
  • Smith, Michael B. 2020. "Organic Synthesis." 4th ed. Academic Press.
  • Carey, Francis A., and Richard J. Sundberg. 2007. "Advanced Organic Chemistry, Part A: Structure and Mechanisms." 5th ed. New York: Springer.
  • Anslyn, Eric V., and Dennis A. Dougherty. 2006. Modern Physical Organic Chemistry. Sausalito, CA: University Science Books.
  • Bretherick, Leslie. 1990. Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. London: Butterworths.
  • Urben, Peter, ed. 2017. Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 8th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Yoshida, Tadao, Yusaku Iwata, Hiroshi Itoh, and Mitsuru Arai. 2009. Safe Storage of Reactive Chemicals. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Mortimer, Charles E. 2005. Chemistry: A Conceptual Approach. 9th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Engel, Thomas, and Philip Reid. 2013. Physical Chemistry. 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson.
  • Steinfeld, Jeffrey I., Joseph S. Francisco, and William L. Hase. 1998. Chemical Kinetics and Dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Houston, Paul L. 2001. Chemical Kinetics and Reaction Dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Eyring, Henry. 1935. "The Activated Complex in Chemical Reactions." Journal of Chemical Physics 3 (2): 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1749604.
  • Kresge, A. Jerry. 2001. "Reaction kinetics in 100-year-old laboratories." Chemical Society Reviews 30 (4): 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1039/B100445F.
  • Brönsted, J. N. 1929. "Acid and Basic Catalysis." Chemical Reviews 5 (3): 231–338. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60019a001.
  • Larock, Richard C. 2018. Comprehensive Organic Transformations: A Guide to Functional Group Preparations. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Mundy, Bradford P., Michael G. Ellerd, and Frank G. Favaloro Jr. 2005. Name Reactions and Reagents in Organic Synthesis. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
  • Li, Jie Jack. 2014. Name Reactions: A Collection of Detailed Mechanisms and Synthetic Applications. 5th ed. Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Kürti, László, and Barbara Czakó. 2005. Strategic Applications of Named Reactions in Organic Synthesis. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Trost, Barry M., and Ian Fleming, eds. 1991. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis: Selectivity, Strategy, and Efficiency in Modern Organic Chemistry. 9 vols. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Ojima, Iwao, ed. 2010. Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Jacobsen, Eric N., Andreas Pfaltz, and Hisashi Yamamoto, eds. 1999. Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis. 3 vols. Berlin: Springer.
  • Hartwig, John F. 2010. Organotransition Metal Chemistry: From Bonding to Catalysis. Sausalito, CA: University Science Books.
  • Crabtree, Robert H. 2014. The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Negishi, Ei-ichi, ed. 2002. Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis. 2 vols. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
  • de Meijere, Armin, and François Diederich, eds. 2004. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
  • Berkessel, Albrecht, and Harald Gröger. 2005. Asymmetric Organocatalysis: From Biomimetic Concepts to Applications in Asymmetric Synthesis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
  • Dalko, Peter I., ed. 2007. Enantioselective Organocatalysis: Reactions and Experimental Procedures. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
  • List, Benjamin, Richard A. Lerner, and Carlos F. Barbas III. 2000. "Proline-catalyzed direct asymmetric aldol reactions." Journal of the American Chemical Society 122 (10): 2395–2396. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja994280y.
  • MacMillan, David W. C. 2008. "The advent and development of organocatalysis." Nature 455 (7211): 304–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07367.
  • Noyori, Ryōji. 2002. "Asymmetric catalysis: science and opportunities (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 41 (12): 2008–2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<2008::AID-ANIE2008>3.0.CO;2-4.
  • Sharpless, K. Barry. 2002. "Searching for new reactivity (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 41 (12): 2024–2032. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<2024::AID-ANIE2024>3.0.CO;2-O.
  • Knowles, William S. 2002. "Asymmetric hydrogenations (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 41 (12): 1998–2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<1998::AID-ANIE1998>3.0.CO;2-8.
  • Grubbs, Robert H. 2006. "Olefin-metathesis catalysts for the preparation of molecules and materials (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 45 (23): 3760–3765. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200600680.
  • Schrock, Richard R. 2006. "Multiple metal-carbon bonds for catalytic metathesis reactions (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 45 (23): 3748–3759. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200600085.
  • Suzuki, Akira. 2011. "Cross-coupling reactions of organoboranes: an easy way to construct C-C bonds (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 50 (30): 6722–6737. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201101379.
  • Negishi, Ei-ichi. 2011. "Magical power of transition metals: past, present, and future (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 50 (30): 6738–6764. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201101380.
  • List, Benjamin, and David W. C. MacMillan. 2022. "Asymmetric organocatalysis (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61 (38): e202205927. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202205927.
  • Bertozzi, Carolyn R., Morten Meldal, and K. Barry Sharpless. 2023. "Click chemistry and bioorthogonal chemistry (Nobel lectures)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (16): e202300332. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202300332.
  • Weissermel, Klaus, and Hans-Jürgen Arpe. 2003. Industrial Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
  • Wittcoff, Harold A., Bryan G. Reuben, and Jeffrey S. Plotkin. 2013. Industrial Organic Chemicals. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Appl, Max. 2006. "Ammonia, 2. Production Processes." In Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.o02_o11.
  • Thiemann, Michael, Erich Scheibler, and Karl Wilhelm Wiegand. 2000. "Nitric Acid, Nitrous Acid, and Nitrogen Oxides." In Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a17_293.
  • Hocking, Martin B. 2005. Handbook of Chemical Technology and Pollution Control. 3rd ed. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
  • Corey, E. J., and László Kürti. 2010. Enantioselective Chemical Synthesis: Methods, Logic, and Practice. Direct Book Publishing.
  • Nicolaou, K. C., and E. J. Sorensen. 1996. Classics in Total Synthesis: Targets, Strategies, Methods. Weinheim: VCH.
  • Nicolaou, K. C., and Jason S. Chen. 2011. Classics in Total Synthesis III: Further Targets, Strategies, Methods. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
  • House, Herbert O. 1972. Modern Synthetic Reactions. 2nd ed. Menlo Park, CA: W. A. Benjamin.
  • Organic Syntheses, Inc. 2024. "Organic Syntheses Collective Volumes 1–10 (1932–2004) and Annual Volumes 1–100 (1922–2024)." Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://www.orgsyn.org/.
  • Paquette, Leo A., David Crich, Philip L. Fuchs, Gary A. Molander, and Andre B. Charette, eds. 2009. Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis (e-EROS). 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/047084289X.
Extended bibliography — 3 sources (PubMed/CrossRef/EuropePMC)
  • PUBZhong W; He S; Chen P; Xiang X; Liu X; Zhang C. 2026. "Upcycling Waste Etchant into a Doped-Cu(2)O Electrocatalyst for Efficient Acetoxime Synthesis from Nitrate and Acetone." Environmental science & technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c16305.
  • PUBLai Y; Liu S; Yu H; Song T; Guo J; Liu Y. 2026. "S,N-Codoped Carbon Dots Derived From Acetone and Thiourea via Solvothermal Method: A Fluorescent Probe for Ag(+) Ion Detection." Luminescence : the journal of biological and chemical luminescence. https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.70401.
  • PUBHu Y; Xie W; Wang Z; Ma J; Hou L; Wang Q. 2025. "Facile Fabrication of Room-Temperature Parts-per-Billion-Level Acetone Sensor Driven by In Situ Laser-Induced Oxygen-Vacancy-Rich Cu/Cu(2)O/CuO Composites." ACS sensors. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.5c02150.
📤 Embed this molecule on your site

Have a blog, forum or scientific service? Embed the interactive 3D molecule on your website — every reader will see it, with a link below to our shop where they can buy the reagent.

🔗 HTML iframe code (easiest — works everywhere)

Copy and paste into your site's HTML editor:

Adjust width and height to your layout.

⚙ WordPress Shortcode (for other shops with MOL-GOD)

🌐 Direct link (for emails, chats, LinkedIn, Twitter)

LinkedIn Twitter/X Facebook
QR code CAS 67-64-1

📱 QR code (for printing on flyers / labels / catalogs)

Place it in a product catalog, on a bottle label or a flyer. The customer scans it — sees the 3D molecule on their phone, with a link to your shop.

⬇ Download PNG

🖼 Open Graph image (for social media meta tags)

When you share the link, Facebook/LinkedIn/Discord will automatically fetch the image preview:

Preview
📋 License: The embed keeps a backlink to DH Scientific (required — the shop is the data source). Chemical data comes from PubChem (CC0 — public domain). The embed is FREE for educational, commercial and hobby use.
📚 REFERENCES (Aggregate bibliography, Chicago Author-Date) 107 items

All scientific sources cited in the accordions above for CAS 67-64-1. Format: Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed., Author-Date system.

🗄️ Scientific databases

  1. NIST. 2026. NIST Chemistry WebBook: CAS 67-64-1. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=67-64-1. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  2. AIST. 2026. Spectral Database for Organic Compounds (SDBS): CAS 67-64-1. Tsukuba, Japan: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology. https://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp/. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  3. PubChem. 2026. PubChem Compound Summary: CAS 67-64-1. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=67-64-1. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  4. ECHA. 2026. C&L Inventory and REACH Registration: CAS 67-64-1. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/annex-vi-to-clp. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)

📐 Standards / Guidelines

  1. ICH. 2026. "ICH Harmonised Guideline: CAS 67-64-1." Geneva: International Council for Harmonisation. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q1A%28R2%29%20Guideline.pdf. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  2. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 2024. "NFPA 30: Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code." NFPA, Quincy, MA. https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/all-codes-and-standards/list-of-codes-and-standards/detail?code=30.
  3. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2023. "29 CFR 1910.106 — Flammable Liquids." U.S. Department of Labor, Federal Register. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.106.
  4. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). 2024. "Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) — Harmonised Classification and Labelling." ECHA, Helsinki / Official Journal of the European Union. https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/clp/clp-classification.
  5. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016. "EN 374-1:2016 — Protective gloves against dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms — Part 1: Terminology and performance requirements for chemical risks." CEN, Brussels. https://standards.cencenelec.eu/dyn/www/f?p=205:110:::::FSP_PROJECT,FSP_ORG_ID:38536,6080&cs=1B0DAA8B85DF42E4A2C70E5D71F0BFA32.
  6. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2001. "EN 166:2001 — Personal eye-protection — Specifications." CEN, Brussels. https://standards.cencenelec.eu/dyn/www/f?p=CEN:110:0::::FSP_PROJECT:6541&cs=1F1A4E0A78C4DB6A28DBE2E8C29D89DCF.
  7. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2009. "EN 14605:2005+A1:2009 — Protective clothing against liquid chemicals — Performance requirements for clothing with liquid-tight (Type 3) or spray-tight (Type 4) connections." CEN, Brussels. https://standards.cencenelec.eu/dyn/www/f?p=CEN:110:0::::FSP_PROJECT:21581&cs=1A04A2D3C7CC58E9E6CB58D55F7EBFB7E.
  8. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2017. "Recommendations for Chemical Protective Clothing: A Companion to the NIOSH Pocket Guide." U.S. Department of Health & Human Services / CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ncpc/default.html.
  9. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2011. "Personal Protective Equipment — General requirements." U.S. Department of Labor — 29 CFR 1910.132. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.132.

📖 Books

  1. Rumble, John R., ed. 2019. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics: 100th Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://hbcp.chemnetbase.com/.
  2. Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook, 2nd ed.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://www.routledge.com/Hansen-Solubility-Parameters-A-Users-Handbook/Hansen/p/book/9780849372483.
  3. Barton, Allan F. M. 1991. CRC Handbook of Solubility Parameters and Other Cohesion Parameters: 2nd ed.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://www.routledge.com/CRC-Handbook-of-Solubility-Parameters-and-Other-Cohesion-Parameters/Barton/p/book/9780849301766.
  4. Connors, Kenneth A., Gordon L. Amidon, and Valentino J. Stella. 1986. Chemical Stability of Pharmaceuticals: A Handbook for Pharmacists, 2nd ed.. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471734683.
  5. Urben, Peter G. 2017. Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 8th Edition. Academic Press / Elsevier, Oxford. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780081010594.

📘 Monographs

  1. IARC. 2026. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans: CAS 67-64-1. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)

📄 Scientific articles (peer-reviewed)

  1. Stefanis, Emmanuel, and Costas Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." International Journal of Thermophysics 29: 568-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0415-z.
  2. Stoll, Vincent S., and John S. Blanchard. 1990. "Buffers: Principles and Practice: In Methods in Enzymology, vol. 182." San Diego: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(90)82008-P.

🌐 Websites

  1. ECHA. 2023. "Guidance on the Application of the CLP Criteria." European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/guidance-documents/guidance-on-clp.
  2. European Parliament. 2006. "Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH)." Official Journal of the European Union L 396: 1–849.
  3. ECHA. 2023. "Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern for Authorisation." European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/candidate-list-table.
  4. European Parliament. 2008. "Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP)." Official Journal of the European Union L 353: 1–1355.
  5. ECHA. 2017. "Guidance on the Compilation of Safety Data Sheets." Version 3.1. European Chemicals Agency. ECHA-17-G-01-EN. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/23047722/sds_en.pdf.
  6. ECHA. 2022. "Restrictions Under REACH — Annex XVII." European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/substances-restricted-under-reach.
  7. United Nations. 2021. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). 9th revised ed. ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.9. New York and Geneva: United Nations. https://unece.org/ghs-rev9-2021.
  8. ECHA. 2020. "Understanding REACH." European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/reach/understanding-reach.
  9. U.S. OSHA. 2026. "Occupational Safety and Health Guidance: CAS 67-64-1." Washington, DC: U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. https://www.osha.gov/hazwoper. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  10. National Fire Protection Association (2018) — NFPA 472: Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/nfpa-472.
  11. European Union. 2026. "EUR-Lex Legal Database: CAS 67-64-1." Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32012L0018. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  12. U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2024) — NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/.
  13. Snyder, Lloyd R., John W. Dolan, and Joseph J. Kirkland. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. Wiley.
  14. Schoenmakers, Peter J.. 1986. Optimization of Chromatographic Selectivity: A Guide to Method Development. Elsevier.
  15. Snyder, L. R., and J. W. Dolan. 2007. High-Performance Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model. Wiley.
  16. Nikitas, Pavlos, and Adrian Pappa-Louisi. 2009. "Retention models for isocratic and gradient elution in reversed-phase liquid chromatography." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1737-1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.10.005.
  17. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094.
  18. Dong, Michael W.. 2019. HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793.
  19. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026.
  20. Dolan, John W.. 2013. "When to Modify Method Conditions." LCGC North America 31: 192-199. https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/when-modify-method-conditions.
  21. Meyer, Veronika R.. 2010. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Wiley.
  22. Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. 100 Years of Chromatography. Wiley-VCH.
  23. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z.
  24. Van Deemter, J. J., F. J. Zuiderweg, and A. Klinkenberg. 1956. "Longitudinal diffusion and resistance to mass transfer as causes of nonideality in chromatography." https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(56)80003-1.
  25. Giddings, J. Calvin. 1965. "Dynamics of Chromatography, Part I: Principles and Theory." Marcel Dekker.
  26. Poppe, Hans. 1997. "Some reflections on speed and efficiency of modern chromatographic methods." https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00376-2.
  27. Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026.
  28. Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094.
  29. Knox, John H.. 1977. "Practical aspects of LC theory." https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/15.9.352.
  30. Snyder, L. R., J. J. Kirkland, and J. L. Glajch. 1997. "Practical HPLC Method Development." Wiley.
  31. Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z.
  32. Sadek, Paul C.. 2002. "The HPLC Solvent Guide." Wiley-Interscience.
  33. Snyder, L. R.. 1978. "Classification of the solvent properties of common liquids." https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/16.6.223.
  34. Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2010. "Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry." Wiley-VCH.
  35. Vailaya, Anant, and Csaba Horváth. 1998. "Retention thermodynamics in hydrophobic interaction chromatography." https://doi.org/10.1021/ie980212h.
  36. Krstulović, Andrea M., and Phyllis R. Brown. 1981. "Reversed-phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography." Wiley.
  37. Boysen, Reinhard I., and Milton T. W. Hearn. 2009. "Multi-modal HPLC of proteins." https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/47.8.645.
  38. USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography." United States Pharmacopeial Convention. https://www.usp.org/harmonization-standards/pdg/general-chapters/chromatography.
  39. Foley, Joe P., and John G. Dorsey. 1983. "Equations for calculation of chromatographic figures of merit for ideal and skewed peaks." https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00255a033.
  40. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183.
  41. Dolan, John W.. 2003. "Peak tailing and resolution." https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/peak-tailing-and-resolution.
  42. Kromidas, Stavros. 2017. "HPLC Made to Measure: A Practical Handbook for Optimization." Wiley-VCH.
  43. Heyden, Yvan Vander, et al.. 2009. "Robustness of pharmaceutical liquid chromatographic methods." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.10.052.
  44. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2024. "USP <621> Chromatography." In United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary, USP 47-NF 42. Rockville, MD: USP. https://www.uspnf.com/.
  45. European Pharmacopoeia Commission. 2024. "2.2.46 Chromatographic Separation Techniques." In European Pharmacopoeia, 11th ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe — EDQM. https://www.edqm.eu/en/european-pharmacopoeia-ph-eur-11th-edition.
  46. International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
  47. Kolthoff, Izaak Maurits, and Philip J. Elving, eds. 1978. Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Part I: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
  48. Skoog, Douglas A., F. James Holler, and Stanley R. Crouch. 2018. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 7th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
  49. Christian, Gary D., Purnendu K. Dasgupta, and Kevin A. Schug. 2014. Analytical Chemistry. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  50. EURACHEM/CITAC. 2012. "Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement." 3rd ed. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4. https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/QUAM2012_P1.pdf.
  51. Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183.
  52. Dolan, John W.. 2003. "How much resolution is enough?." https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/how-much-resolution-enough.
  53. USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography (System Suitability section)." United States Pharmacopeial Convention. https://www.usp.org/harmonization-standards/pdg/general-chapters/chromatography.
  54. U.S. FDA. 2026. "FDA Guidance and Resources: CAS 67-64-1." Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/media/74954/download. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  55. Rozet, Eric, et al.. 2013. "Analysis of recent pharmaceutical regulatory documents on analytical method validation." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.111.
  56. European Medicines Agency (EMA). 2011. "Guideline on bioanalytical method validation EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009." EMA. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-bioanalytical-method-validation_en.pdf.
  57. Kazakevich, Yuri V., and Rosario LoBrutto, eds.. 2007. "HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists." Wiley-Interscience. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470087954.
  58. AOAC International. 2016. "Appendix F: Guidelines for Standard Method Performance Requirements." AOAC INTERNATIONAL. https://www.aoac.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/app_f.pdf.
  59. International Organization for Standardization. 1994. "ISO 5725-2:1994 Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results — Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/11834.html.
  60. Grubbs, Frank E. 1950. "Sample Criteria for Testing Outlying Observations." Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (1): 27–58.
  61. Dixon, Wilfrid J. 1950. "Analysis of Extreme Values." Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (4): 488–506.
  62. Snedecor, George W., and William G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
  63. Student [William Sealy Gosset]. 1908. "The Probable Error of a Mean." Biometrika 6 (1): 1–25.
  64. International Organization for Standardization. 2005. "ISO 3534-1:2006 Statistics — Vocabulary and Symbols — Part 1: General Statistical Terms and Terms Used in Probability." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/40145.html.
  65. Thompson, Michael, Stephen L. R. Ellison, and Roger Wood. 2002. "Harmonized Guidelines for Single-Laboratory Validation of Methods of Analysis." Pure and Applied Chemistry 74 (5): 835–855.
  66. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2024. European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), Applicable as from 1 January 2025 (ECE/TRANS/352). Geneva: UNECE. https://unece.org/transport/dangerous-goods/adr-2025-edition.
  67. International Air Transport Association. 2026. Dangerous Goods Regulations (DGR). 67th ed. Montreal: IATA. https://www.iata.org/en/programs/cargo/dgr/.
  68. International Maritime Organization. 2024. International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code, 2024 Edition (Amendment 42-24). London: IMO. https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/DangerousGoods-default.aspx.
  69. United Nations. 2025. Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods: Model Regulations (Orange Book). 24th revised ed. ST/SG/AC.10/1/Rev.24. New York and Geneva: United Nations. https://unece.org/transport/dangerous-goods/un-model-regulations.
  70. International Civil Aviation Organization. 2025. Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air (Doc 9284). 2025–2026 ed. Montreal: ICAO. https://www.icao.int/safety/DangerousGoods/Pages/technical-instructions.aspx.
  71. United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Convention. 2024. "USP General Chapter <621> Chromatography." USP. https://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp/document/harmonization/gen-chapter/g05_pf_30_4_2004.pdf.
  72. European Medicines Agency (EMA). 2011. "Guideline on bioanalytical method validation EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009." EMA Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-bioanalytical-method-validation_en.pdf.
  73. Sejm RP. 2026. "Internetowy System Aktow Prawnych (ISAP): CAS 67-64-1." Warszawa: Kancelaria Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20200000010. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  74. Ministerstwo Klimatu i Srodowiska. 2026. "Baza Danych o Odpadach (BDO): CAS 67-64-1." Warszawa: Ministerstwo Klimatu i Srodowiska. https://bdo.mos.gov.pl/. (Accessed 2026-11-12.)
  75. Pohanish, Richard P.. 2017. "Sittig's Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens." Elsevier.
  76. Lewis, Richard J.. 2012. "Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials." Wiley.
  77. NIOSH. 2024. "Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/.
  78. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2023. "European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR 2025)." UNECE. https://unece.org/transport/standards/transport/dangerous-goods/adr-2025.
  79. IPCS INCHEM. 2024. "International Programme on Chemical Safety — Waste Management Guidelines." WHO/UNEP/ILO. https://www.inchem.org/.
  80. International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories." ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
  81. World Health Organization. 2010. "WHO Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceutical Products: Main Principles (WHO Technical Report Series No. 957, Annex 3)." WHO Press. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/trs957-annex3.
  82. European Medicines Agency. 2014. "Guideline on Process Validation for Finished Products — Information and Data to Be Provided EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/BWP/70278/2012." European Medicines Agency. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-process-validation-finished-products-information-data-be-provided-regulatory-submissions-revision-1_en.pdf.
  83. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2024. "United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary, USP 47-NF 42." USP. https://www.uspnf.com/.
  84. European Pharmacopoeia Commission. 2024. "European Pharmacopoeia 11th Edition." Council of Europe — EDQM. https://www.edqm.eu/en/european-pharmacopoeia-ph-eur-11th-edition.
  85. Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S). 2021. "Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products PE 009-15." PIC/S Secretariat, Geneva. https://picscheme.org/en/publications.
  86. International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council (IPEC) and Pharmaceutical Quality Group (PQG). 2017. "Joint IPEC-PQG Good Manufacturing Practices Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients." IPEC-Americas. https://ipecamericas.org/sites/default/files/IPECPQGGMPGuide2017.pdf.
📥 Download BibTeX📥 Download RISImport into Zotero/Mendeley/EndNote/Papers.